Advancing SEM Based Nano-Scale Defect Analysis in Semiconductor Manufacturing for Advanced IC Nodes

Bappaditya Dey,Matthias Monden,Victor Blanco,Sandip Halder,Stefan De Gendt
2024-09-06
Abstract:In this research, we introduce a unified end-to-end Automated Defect Classification-Detection-Segmentation (ADCDS) framework for classifying, detecting, and segmenting multiple instances of semiconductor defects for advanced nodes. This framework consists of two modules: (a) a defect detection module, followed by (b) a defect segmentation module. The defect detection module employs Deformable DETR to aid in the classification and detection of nano-scale defects, while the segmentation module utilizes BoxSnake. BoxSnake facilitates box-supervised instance segmentation of nano-scale defects, supported by the former module. This simplifies the process by eliminating the laborious requirement for ground-truth pixel-wise mask annotation by human experts, which is typically associated with training conventional segmentation models. We have evaluated the performance of our ADCDS framework using two distinct process datasets from real wafers, as ADI and AEI, specifically focusing on Line-space patterns. We have demonstrated the applicability and significance of our proposed methodology, particularly in the nano-scale segmentation and generation of binary defect masks, using the challenging ADI SEM dataset where ground-truth pixelwise segmentation annotations were unavailable. Furthermore, we have presented a comparative analysis of our proposed framework against previous approaches to demonstrate its effectiveness. Our proposed framework achieved an overall mAP@IoU0.5 of 72.19 for detection and 78.86 for segmentation on the ADI dataset. Similarly, for the AEI dataset, these metrics were 90.38 for detection and 95.48 for segmentation. Thus, our proposed framework effectively fulfils the requirements of advanced defect analysis while addressing significant constraints.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the problems of nano - scale defect analysis and detection in advanced nodes (Advanced IC Nodes) in semiconductor manufacturing. Specifically, the main objectives of the research include: 1. **Improve the automation level of nano - scale defect classification, detection and segmentation**: - Introduce a unified end - to - end automatic defect classification - detection - segmentation (ADCDS) framework for classifying, detecting and segmenting multiple semiconductor defect instances. - This framework consists of two modules: (a) The defect detection module, which uses Deformable DETR for classification and detection; (b) The defect segmentation module, which utilizes BoxSnake for box - based supervised instance segmentation. 2. **Reduce the need for manual annotation**: - Eliminate the need for pixel - level ground - truth mask annotation, simplify the training process, and avoid the problem that traditional segmentation models require a large amount of manual annotation. - This can significantly reduce the workload of manual annotation and improve the deployability of the model in high - volume manufacturing (HVM). 3. **Meet the challenges of low signal - to - noise ratio (SNR) and complex defect patterns**: - When using thin resist materials and new underlayer/hard masks, the detection signal becomes very weak, making it difficult for traditional detection and metrology equipment to accurately identify these tiny defects. - Enhance the signal detection ability through deep - learning methods, especially in a low - SNR environment, to improve the accuracy of defect detection. 4. **Verify the effectiveness and applicability of the framework**: - Evaluate the performance of the ADCDS framework using two different process data sets (ADI and AEI) from actual wafers. - In particular, the first demonstration was carried out on the ADI SEM data set, in which no pixel - level ground - truth segmentation annotation was available, showing the ability of the framework to handle challenging data sets. 5. **Compare the performance with existing methods**: - Compare the proposed ADCDS framework with previous research methods to prove its superiority in defect detection and segmentation tasks. - On the ADI data set, the mAP@IoU0.5 of the detection module reached 72.19%, and the mAP@IoU0.5 of the segmentation module reached 78.86%; on the AEI data set, the corresponding indicators were 90.38% and 95.48% respectively. Through these improvements, the method proposed in this paper can effectively meet the needs of advanced defect analysis and solve the significant constraints currently faced by the industry.