Abstract:We study situations where a group of voters need to take a collective decision over a number of public issues, with the goal of getting a result that reflects the voters' opinions in a proportional manner. Our focus is on interconnected public decisions, where the decision on one or more issues has repercussions on the acceptance or rejection of other public issues in the agenda. We show that the adaptations of classical justified-representation axioms to this enriched setting are always satisfiable only for restricted classes of public agendas. However, the use of suitably adapted well-known decision rules on a class of quite expressive constraints, yields proportionality guarantees that match these justified-representation properties in an approximate sense. We also identify another path to achieving proportionality via an adaptation of the notion of priceability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to ensure that collective decision - making can reflect the opinions of voters and achieve proportionality in the presence of constraints. Specifically:
1. **Background problem**: In many collective decision - making scenarios, a group of voters need to make binary choices (accept or reject) on multiple public issues. There may be interdependencies among these issues, that is, the decision on one issue will affect the acceptance or rejection of other issues. For example, in participatory budgeting, the implementation of one project may depend on the acceptance of another project.
2. **Research objective**: The author focuses on how to ensure that the final result can reflect the opinions of voters in a proportional manner in these inter - related public decisions. However, due to the existence of constraints (such as budget limitations, diversity requirements, etc.), it is difficult to directly apply classical fairness axioms (such as proportional representation).
3. **Core challenge**: When constraints are introduced, originally feasible fair results may become infeasible. Therefore, the author attempts to answer the following question: What can we do to ensure proportional representation under constraints?
### Specific problem description
- **Existence of constraints**: Public decision - making models in reality usually contain various constraints, which limit the possible collective decision - making results. For example, in participatory budgeting, the selection of one project may depend on the acceptance or rejection of another project; in committee elections, there may be specific diversity requirements.
- **Proportional representation**: Ideally, if a certain group accounts for a proportion of \(\alpha\) of the total population, then their opinions should be reflected in \(\alpha\) proportion of the \(m\) issues. But in the presence of constraints, this ideal fairness may not be achievable.
### Main contributions of the paper
1. **Introduction of new axioms**: The author proposes proportional representation axioms adapted to constraints, such as cohEJR (Cohesiveness - based Extended Justified Representation) and cohJR (Cohesiveness - based Justified Representation), and explores the feasibility of these axioms under different constraints.
2. **Algorithm design**: The author proposes an algorithm that can find all voter groups with (S, w)-deviation under a given election instance and result, thereby evaluating whether cohEJR or cohJR is satisfied.
3. **Analysis of the impact of constraints**: By introducing the NFD (No Fixed Decisions) property, the author proves that in some "small" - scale election instances, cohEJR can always be satisfied.
### Conclusion
The main purpose of this paper is to explore how, in the presence of constraints, by adjusting existing proportional representation axioms and designing new algorithms, collective decision - making can reflect the opinions of voters as much as possible and achieve proportional representation. This provides new ideas and methods for future related research.