Abstract:The apportionment problem constitutes a fundamental problem in democratic societies: How to distribute a fixed number of seats among a set of states in proportion to the states' populations? This--seemingly simple--task has led to a rich literature and has become well known in the context of the US House of Representatives. In this paper, we connect the design of monotone apportionment methods to classic problems from discrete geometry and combinatorial optimization and explore the extent to which randomization can enhance proportionality. We first focus on the well-studied family of stationary divisor methods, which satisfy the strong population monotonicity property, and show that this family produces only a slightly superlinear number of different outputs as a function of the number of states. While our upper and lower bounds leave a small gap, we show that--surprisingly--closing this gap would solve a long-standing open problem from discrete geometry, known as the complexity of $k$-levels in line arrangements. The main downside of divisor methods is their violation of the quota axiom, i.e., every state should receive $\lfloor q_i\rfloor$ or $\lceil q_i\rceil$ seats, where $q_i$ is the proportional share of the state. As we show that randomizing over divisor methods can only partially overcome this issue, we propose a relaxed version of divisor methods in which the total number of seats may slightly deviate from the house size. By randomizing over them, we can simultaneously satisfy population monotonicity, quota, and ex-ante proportionality. Finally, we turn our attention to quota-compliant methods that are house-monotone, i.e., no state may lose a seat when the house size is increased. We provide a polyhedral characterization based on network flows, which implies a simple description of all ex-ante proportional randomized methods that are house-monotone and quota-compliant.

The proportional solution for rights problems

Proportionality for Constrained Public Decisions

Proportional Consistency of Apportionment Methods

Almost Proportional Allocations of Indivisible Chores: Computation, Approximation and Efficiency

Proportionality and the Limits of Welfarism

The Leximin Approach for a Sequence of Collective Decisions

Truthfulness, Proportional Fairness, and Efficiency

On allocations that give intersecting groups their fair share

Settling the Score: Portioning with Cardinal Preferences

A New Approach to Fair Distribution of Welfare

Axiomatic characterizations of some simple risk-sharing rules

Proportional clearing mechanisms in financial systems: An axiomatic approach

Strategyproof and Proportionally Fair Facility Location

A Solution to Bargaining Problem on Divisible Goods

Proportionality in Approval-Based Participatory Budgeting

Truthfulness of a Proportional Sharing Mechanism in Resource Exchange

Justified Fairness in House Allocation Problems: two Characterizations of Strategy-proof Mechanisms

Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses

Tullock contest alliances with proportional prize-sharing agreements: private collective action mechanisms?

New Combinatorial Insights for Monotone Apportionment

The Fairness of Leximin in Allocation of Indivisible Chores