Abstract:Unsteady cloud cavitating flow is detrimental to the efficiency of hydraulic machinery like pumps and propellers due to the resulting side-effects of vibration, noise and erosion damage. Modelling such a unsteady and highly turbulent flow remains a challenging issue. In this paper, cloud cavitating flow in a venturi is calculated using the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) model combined with the Merkle model. The Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) method is employed to speed up the calculation and investigate the mechanisms for vortex development in the venturi. The results indicate the velocity gradients and the generalized fluid element strongly influence the formation of vortices throughout a cavitation cycle. In addition, the cavitation-turbulence coupling is investigated on the local scale by comparing with high-fidelity experimental data and using profile stations. While the AMR calculation is able to predict well the time-averaged velocities and turbulence-related aspects near the throat, it displays discrepancies further downstream owing to a coarser grid refinement downstream and under-performs compared to a traditional grid simulation . Additionally, the AMR calculations is unable to reproduce the cavity width as observed in the experiments. Therefore, while AMR promises to speed the process significantly by refining grid only in regions of interest, it is comparatively in line with a traditional calculation for cavitating flows. Thus, this study intends to provide a reference to employing AMR as a tool to speed up calculations and be able to simulate turbulence-cavitation interactions accurately.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to efficiently and accurately simulate the cloud - like cavitation flow in nozzles by combining the Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) technique with the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) model. Specifically, the research aims to explore whether AMR can capture the details of cavitation - turbulence interactions, especially the vortex development mechanism on the local scale, while reducing the consumption of computational resources.
### Background and Objectives of the Paper
Cavitation is a multiphase, highly unstable and turbulent phenomenon. When the ambient pressure drops below the vapor pressure, bubble clouds will form. These bubbles move at high speed and burst after leaving the low - pressure area, generating shock waves, which lead to negative impacts such as erosion damage, vibration, and load asymmetry, and seriously affect the performance of hydraulic machinery such as pumps and propellers. In addition, the erosive ability of cavitation can also be used for jet drilling in the oil and geothermal energy fields.
### Research Methods
To study this phenomenon, especially the mechanism of periodic main cavity formation, shedding and collapse, this paper adopts a method that combines the DES model with the Merkle model and introduces the AMR technique. The AMR technique can dynamically refine the grid in specific areas as needed, thereby improving computational efficiency while maintaining a high - resolution description of complex flow structures.
### Main Findings
- **Velocity Gradient and Generalized Fluid Element**: The research results show that the velocity gradient and the generalized fluid element have a significant impact on the formation of vortices throughout the cavitation cycle.
- **Cavitation - Turbulence Coupling**: By comparing with high - fidelity experimental data and using the data of profile stations, the cavitation - turbulence coupling on the local scale was studied.
- **Advantages and Limitations of AMR Computation**:
- AMR computation can better predict the time - averaged velocity near the throat and the characteristics related to turbulence.
- However, due to the relatively coarse grid refinement in the downstream area, the performance of AMR computation in the downstream area is not as good as that of traditional grid simulation.
- AMR computation cannot accurately reproduce the cavitation width observed in the experiment.
### Conclusions
Although the AMR technique significantly accelerates the computational process by refining the grid only in the areas of interest, its performance is comparable to that of traditional computation when simulating cavitation flow. Therefore, this study provides a reference for using AMR as an acceleration computing tool and accurately simulating the turbulence - cavitation interaction.
### Keywords
- Cavitation Flow
- Detached Eddy Simulation (DES)
- Cavitation Model
- Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR)
### Formula Display
- **Q - Criterion**: Defined as the second invariant of the velocity gradient tensor
\[
Q=\frac{1}{2}(|\Omega|^{2}-|S|^{2})
\]
where \(\Omega\) is the vorticity tensor and \(S\) is the strain - rate tensor.
- **Vorticity Transport Equation**:
\[
\frac{D\omega_{z}}{Dt}=[(\omega\cdot\nabla)V]_{z}-[\omega(\nabla\cdot V)]_{z}+\left(\frac{\nabla\rho_{m}\times\nabla p}{\rho_{m}^{2}}\right)_{z}+[(\nu_{m}+\nu_{t})\nabla^{2}\omega]_{z}
\]
where the left side represents the vorticity change rate, and the right side represents the vorticity stretching, vorticity expansion, baroclinic torque and viscous diffusion terms respectively. In high - Reynolds - number flows, the viscous diffusion term can be ignored.
Through these methods and analyses, the paper provides important insights for understanding and optimizing the numerical simulation of cavitation flow.