Abstract:SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 53, Issue 5, Page 1578-1601, October 2024. We show that for any natural number [math], there is a constant [math] and a subgraph-closed class having, for any natural [math], at most [math] graphs on [math] vertices up to isomorphism, but no adjacency labeling scheme with labels of size at most [math]. In other words, for every [math], there is a small—even tiny—monotone class without universal graphs of size [math]. Prior to this result, it was not excluded that every small class has an almost linear universal graph, or equivalently a labeling scheme with labels of size [math]. The existence of such a labeling scheme, a scaled-down version of the recently disproved Implicit Graph Conjecture, was repeatedly raised [Gavoille and Labourel, Proceedings of the 15th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 4698, Springer, 2007, pp. 582–593; Dujmović et al., J. ACM, 68 (2021), pp. 1–33; Bonamy, Gavoille, and Pilipczuk, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 36 (2022), pp. 2082–2099; Bonnet et al., Comb. Theory, 2 (2022)]. Furthermore, our small monotone classes have unbounded twin-width and thus simultaneously disprove the already-refuted Small conjecture, but this time with a self-contained proof, not relying on elaborate group-theoretic constructions. As our main ingredient, we show that with high probability an Erdős–Rényi random graph [math] with [math] has, for every [math], at most [math] subgraphs on [math] vertices, up to isomorphism. As a barrier to our general method of producing even more complex tiny classes, we show that when [math], the latter no longer holds. More concretely, we provide an explicit lower bound on the number of unlabeled [math]-vertex induced subgraphs of [math] when [math]. We thereby obtain a threshold for the property of having exponentially many unlabeled induced subgraphs: if [math] with [math], then with high probability even the number of all unlabeled (not necessarily induced) subgraphs is [math], whereas if [math] for sufficiently large [math], then with high probability the number of unlabeled induced subgraphs is [math]. This result supplements the study of counting unlabeled induced subgraphs that was initiated by Erdős and Rényi with a question on the number of unlabeled induced subgraphs of Ramsey graphs, eventually answered by Shelah.

How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations

The Distributed Complexity of Locally Checkable Labeling Problems Beyond Paths and Trees

The Topology of Local Computing in Networks

Completing the Node-Averaged Complexity Landscape of LCLs on Trees

Local certification of geometric graph classes

Local certification of local properties: tight bounds, trade-offs and new parameters

Local certification of forbidden subgraphs

On the Node-Averaged Complexity of Locally Checkable Problems on Trees

Networks and their degree distribution, leading to a new concept of small worlds

On the local convergence of integer-valued Lipschitz functions on regular trees

Bounded-Diameter Tree-Decompositions

Locally finite graphs and their localization numbers

Local limits of Markov Branching trees and their volume growth

Local limit theorem of Brownian motion on metric trees

Growing trees from compact subgroups

Local central limit theorem for triangle counts in sparse random graphs

Random minimum spanning tree and dense graph limits

Limits of chordal graphs with bounded tree-width

Small but Unwieldy: A Lower Bound on Adjacency Labels for Small Classes

Locally common graphs

Limits of Mallows trees