Investigating Privacy Leakage in Dimensionality Reduction Methods via Reconstruction Attack

Chayadon Lumbut,Donlapark Ponnoprat
2024-08-30
Abstract:This study investigates privacy leakage in dimensionality reduction methods through a novel machine learning-based reconstruction attack. Employing an \emph{informed adversary} threat model, we develop a neural network capable of reconstructing high-dimensional data from low-dimensional embeddings. We evaluate six popular dimensionality reduction techniques: PCA, sparse random projection (SRP), multidimensional scaling (MDS), Isomap, $t$-SNE, and UMAP. Using both MNIST and NIH Chest X-ray datasets, we perform a qualitative analysis to identify key factors affecting reconstruction quality. Furthermore, we assess the effectiveness of an additive noise mechanism in mitigating these reconstruction attacks.
Cryptography and Security,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore the privacy leakage problem in dimension reduction methods and evaluate the security of different dimension reduction techniques through a novel machine - learning - based reconstruction attack. Specifically, the authors raise the following questions: 1. **Risk of privacy leakage**: With the wide application of dimension reduction methods on sensitive data, these methods may retain certain information in the original high - dimensional data, leading to potential privacy risks. In particular, although the low - dimensional representation after dimension reduction is convenient for efficient analysis and visualization, it may also enable an attacker to infer sensitive information about the original data and even determine whether the data of a specific individual is included in the training set. 2. **Privacy differences among different dimension reduction methods**: Different dimension reduction methods adopt different strategies when processing data, so they may have differences in privacy protection. The authors hope to determine through research which dimension reduction methods are more vulnerable to reconstruction attacks and how to effectively defend against these attacks. 3. **Effectiveness of defense mechanisms**: The authors also study a simple additive noise mechanism to evaluate its feasibility in reducing the effect of reconstruction attacks and explore the specific impact of this defense method on different dimension reduction methods. ### Overview of research methods To answer the above questions, the authors take the following steps: - **Propose a threat model and reconstruction attack framework**: The authors construct a hypothetical informed adversary threat model and develop a neural network to reconstruct high - dimensional data from low - dimensional embeddings. - **Evaluate six popular dimension reduction methods**: The authors select six common dimension reduction methods (PCA, SRP, MDS, Isomap, t - SNE, and UMAP) and evaluate them on the MNIST handwritten digit dataset and the NIH chest X - ray dataset. - **Analyze the influencing factors of reconstruction quality**: Through qualitative analysis, the authors identify the key factors affecting reconstruction quality and evaluate the effectiveness of the additive noise mechanism in mitigating reconstruction attacks. ### Main contributions 1. **General attack framework**: A threat model and reconstruction attack framework that can be applied to any dimension reduction method are proposed. 2. **Compare privacy leakage of different dimension reduction methods**: Using the proposed attack framework, the privacy leakage of six popular dimension reduction methods is compared. 3. **Explore defense mechanisms**: The impact of the additive noise mechanism on the reconstruction quality of different dimension reduction methods is studied, revealing which methods can still retain information well after applying the defense mechanism. ### Conclusion This study shows that different dimension reduction methods exhibit different vulnerabilities when facing privacy attacks. For example, PCA is one of the most vulnerable methods, while SRP is relatively robust. In addition, appropriate defense measures (such as additive noise) can relieve the effect of reconstruction attacks to a certain extent, but they will also have an impact on the quality of the data after dimension reduction.