Abstract:Despite ongoing research on the topic of adversarial examples in deep learning for computer vision, some fundamentals of the nature of these attacks remain unclear. As the manifold hypothesis posits, high-dimensional data tends to be part of a low-dimensional manifold. To verify the thesis with adversarial patches, this paper provides an analysis of a set of adversarial patches and investigates the reconstruction abilities of three different dimensionality reduction methods. Quantitatively, the performance of reconstructed patches in an attack setting is measured and the impact of sampled patches from the latent space during adversarial training is investigated. The evaluation is performed on two publicly available datasets for person detection. The results indicate that more sophisticated dimensionality reduction methods offer no advantages over a simple principal component analysis.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the understanding of the nature and behavior of adversarial patches in deep - learning computer vision. Specifically, although certain progress has been made in the research of adversarial samples, some fundamental questions remain unclear. According to the manifold hypothesis, high - dimensional data often belong to a part of a low - dimensional manifold. To verify this hypothesis and gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics of adversarial patches, this paper analyzes a set of adversarial patches and evaluates the performance of three different dimensionality - reduction methods in the attack setting. ### Main research questions of the paper: 1. **Nature of adversarial patches**: Understand why adversarial patches can successfully deceive the target detector and their distribution characteristics in high - dimensional space. 2. **Effectiveness of dimensionality - reduction methods**: Evaluate the performance of different dimensionality - reduction methods (such as Principal Component Analysis PCA, Auto - Encoder AE, Conditional Variational Auto - Encoder CVAE) in reconstructing adversarial patches, and explore whether the adversarial patches generated by these methods can effectively attack the target detector. 3. **Impact of adversarial training**: Study the effect of using adversarial patches sampled from a low - dimensional manifold for adversarial training and the impact of this method on the model's robustness. ### Research background: - Adversarial patch attacks are an important issue in the field of computer vision, especially in object detection tasks. However, the current understanding of the essence of these attacks is still limited. - The manifold hypothesis holds that high - dimensional data are usually located on a low - dimensional manifold, which means that adversarial patches may also follow a similar structure. ### Main contributions: 1. **In - depth analysis of adversarial patches**: Reveal the internal structure of a set of adversarial patches through detailed analysis. 2. **Evaluate the performance of different dimensionality - reduction methods**: Compare the performance of PCA, AE, and CVAE in reconstructing adversarial patches and evaluate their effectiveness in the attack setting. 3. **Impact of adversarial training**: Study the effect of using adversarial patches sampled from a low - dimensional manifold for adversarial training and explore its potential impact on the model's robustness. ### Experimental design: - Use the YOLOv7 tiny model as the reference object detector. - Conduct experiments on two public datasets, INRIA Person and Crowdhuman. - Measure the performance change of the detector by mean Average Precision (mAP). ### Conclusions: - This study shows that complex manifold - learning methods (such as AE and CVAE) are not significantly better than the simple PCA method. - A small - scale set of adversarial patches or patches sampled using PCA are sufficient to achieve effective adversarial attacks. - These results further support the applicability of the manifold hypothesis in adversarial patches, and future work should further verify this. Through these studies, the author hopes to provide new insights for understanding and defending against adversarial attacks and promote the further development of related fields.

Traversing the Subspace of Adversarial Patches

Eigenpatches -- Adversarial Patches from Principal Components

Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patches

Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality

Sparse patches adversarial attacks via extrapolating point-wise information

Adversarial Attacks in a Multi-view Setting: An Empirical Study of the Adversarial Patches Inter-view Transferability

Adversarial Manhole: Challenging Monocular Depth Estimation and Semantic Segmentation Models with Patch Attack

DPG: a model to build feature subspace against adversarial patch attack

DefensiveDR: Defending against Adversarial Patches using Dimensionality Reduction

An information-theoretic perspective of physical adversarial patches

Generating Adversarial yet Inconspicuous Patches with a Single Image

Benchmarking Adversarial Patch Against Aerial Detection

On-manifold Adversarial Attack Based on Latent Space Substitute Model

Breaking the Illusion: Real-world Challenges for Adversarial Patches in Object Detection

Natural Adversarial Patch Generation Method Based on Latent Diffusion Model

Defending Adversarial Patches via Joint Region Localizing and Inpainting

Adversarial patch attacks against aerial imagery object detectors

Adversarial Patch Attacks on Monocular Depth Estimation Networks

Empirical Evaluation of Physical Adversarial Patch Attacks Against Overhead Object Detection Models

Adversarial examples within the training distribution: A widespread challenge

Exploring Adversarial Examples: Patterns of One-Pixel Attacks