Abstract:Federated learning (FL) is a framework for training machine learning models in a distributed and collaborative manner. During training, a set of participating clients process their data stored locally, sharing only updates of the statistical model's parameters obtained by minimizing a cost function over their local inputs. FL was proposed as a stepping-stone towards privacy-preserving machine learning, but it has been shown to expose clients to issues such as leakage of private information, lack of personalization of the model, and the possibility of having a trained model that is fairer to some groups of clients than to others. In this paper, the focus is on addressing the triadic interaction among personalization, privacy guarantees, and fairness attained by trained models within the FL framework. Differential privacy and its variants have been studied and applied as cutting-edge standards for providing formal privacy guarantees. However, clients in FL often hold very diverse datasets representing heterogeneous communities, making it important to protect their sensitive and personal information while still ensuring that the trained model upholds the aspect of fairness for the users. To attain this objective, a method is put forth that introduces group privacy assurances through the utilization of d -privacy (aka metric privacy). d -privacy represents a localized form of differential privacy that relies on a metric-oriented obfuscation approach to maintain the original data's topological distribution. This method, besides enabling personalized model training in a federated approach and providing formal privacy guarantees, possesses significantly better group fairness measured under a variety of standard metrics than a global model trained within a classical FL template. Theoretical justifications for the applicability are provided, as well as experimental validation on real-world datasets to illustrate the working of the proposed method.

A Multivocal Literature Review on Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning

A Multivocal Literature Review on Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning

Decentral and Incentivized Federated Learning Frameworks: A Systematic Literature Review

Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-off

Exploring Machine Learning Models for Federated Learning: A Review of Approaches, Performance, and Limitations

Federated Learning Meets Fairness and Differential Privacy

Fairness and Privacy in Federated Learning and Their Implications in Healthcare

Privacy, accuracy, and model fairness trade-offs in federated learning

Addressing Bias and Fairness Using Fair Federated Learning: A Synthetic Review

The Impact of Differential Privacy on Model Fairness in Federated Learning.

Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Systematic Review

Fair Differentially Private Federated Learning Framework

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

AI Fairness–From Machine Learning to Federated Learning

A review of federated learning: taxonomy, privacy and future directions

Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives

A Survey on Group Fairness in Federated Learning: Challenges, Taxonomy of Solutions and Directions for Future Research

Advancing Personalized Federated Learning: Group Privacy, Fairness, and Beyond

An overview of implementing security and privacy in federated learning

Toward the Tradeoffs between Privacy, Fairness and Utility in Federated Learning

A Multifaceted Survey on Federated Learning: Fundamentals, Paradigm Shifts, Practical Issues, Recent Developments, Partnerships, Trade-Offs, Trustworthiness, and Ways Forward