The Semantics of Metapropramming in Prolog

David S. Warren

2024-08-15

Abstract:This paper describes a semantics for pure Prolog programs with negation that provides meaning to metaprograms. Metaprograms are programs that construct and use data structures as programs. In Prolog a primary mataprogramming construct is the use of a variable as a literal in the body of a clause. The traditional Prolog 3-line metainterpreter is another example of a metaprogram. The account given here also supplies a meaning for clauses that have a variable as head, even though most Prolog systems do not support such clauses. This semantics naturally includes such programs, giving them their intuitive meaning. Ideas from M. Denecker and his colleagues form the basis of this approach. The key idea is to notice that if we give meanings to all propositional programs and treat Prolog rules with variables as the set of their ground instances, then we can give meanings to all programs. We must treat Prolog rules (which may be metarules) as templates for generating ground propositional rules, and not as first-order formulas, which they may not be. We use parameterized inductive definitions to give propositional models to Prolog programs, in which the propositions are expressions. Then the set of expressions of a propositional model determine a first-order Herbrand Model, providing a first-order logical semantics for all (pure) Prolog programs, including metaprograms. We give examples to show the applicability of this theory. We also demonstrate how this theory makes proofs of some important properties of metaprograms very straightforward.

Programming Languages

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to provide a semantic interpretation for pure Prolog programs containing metaprogramming, especially those with negation and the use of variables in the rule head or rule body. Traditionally, the semantics of Prolog is based on the least Herbrand Model in first - order logic, but this is insufficient for metaprogramming because metaprogramming involves treating data structures as programs, and these data structures may contain variables.

### Specific Problem Description

1. **Semantic Problems of Metaprogramming**:
- Traditional Prolog semantics cannot interpret metaprograms, that is, those programs that construct and use data structures as programs.
- In particular, when the rule head or rule body contains variables, the traditional semantic interpretation methods fail.

2. **Metaprogramming with Negation**:
- Prolog programs can contain rules with negative conditions, but the unconstrained use of these negative conditions may lead to infinite loops and other complex problems.
- It is necessary to provide a semantic interpretation for so - called stratified programs, which can be meaningfully evaluated.

3. **Application of Parameterized Inductive Definitions**:
- The paper proposes a new semantic framework, using parameterized inductive definitions to interpret Prolog programs.
- This method allows Prolog rules to be regarded as templates for generating propositional formulas, rather than being directly mapped to first - order logic formulas.

### Solution Overview

The paper solves the above problems in the following ways:

1. **Introducing Parameterized Inductive Definitions**:
- Use parameterized inductive definitions to interpret Prolog programs, where propositions are ground atomic formulas.
- Regard Prolog rules as templates for generating propositional formulas, rather than first - order logic formulas.

2. **Extension to Programs with Negation**:
- Propose a semantic framework applicable to rules with negative conditions.
- Ensure that negative conditions do not lead to infinite loops and can be correctly interpreted in stratified programs.

3. **Handling Metarules**:
- Provide support for metarules, that is, those rules that are not constructed from first - order atomic formulas.
- By regarding metarules as sets of propositional formulas, give them intuitive semantics.

### Example Illustration

The paper gives several examples to show the application of this theory, such as:

- **Standard Predicate `call/1`**: Shows how to construct queries at runtime and pass them to the Prolog engine.
- **Three - line Meta - interpreter**: Shows how to treat data structures (such as facts of `rule/2`) as programs.
- **Rules with Variable Heads**: Shows how to handle rules with variable heads, although most Prolog systems do not support such rules.

Through these examples, the paper proves that the proposed semantic framework can simplify the proof of some important metaprogram properties and provides a clear logical basis for metaprogramming.

### Summary

The main contribution of this paper is to provide a new semantic framework for Prolog programs containing metaprogramming, especially when dealing with rules with negation and variables. This method not only extends the traditional semantics of Prolog but also provides new tools and perspectives for the research of metaprogramming and logic programming.