Abstract:Not everyone who enrolls in college will leave with a certificate or degree, but the number of people who drop out or take a break is much higher than experts previously believed. In December 2013, there were 29 million people with some college education but no degree. That number jumped to 36 million by December of 2018, according to a new report from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center[1]. It is imperative to understand the underlying factors contributing to student withdrawal and to assist decision-makers to identify effective strategies to prevent it. By analyzing the characteristics and educational pathways of the stopout student population, our aim is to provide actionable insights that can benefit institutions facing similar challenges. Eastern Michigan University (EMU) faces significant challenges in student retention, with approximately 55% of its undergraduate students not completing their degrees within six years. As an institution committed to student success, EMU conducted a comprehensive study of student withdrawals to understand the influencing factors. And the paper revealed a high correlation between certain factors and withdrawals, even in the early stages of university attendance. Based on these findings, we developed a predictive model that employs artificial intelligence techniques to assess the potential risk that students abandon their studies. These models enable universities to implement early intervention strategies, support at-risk students, and improve overall higher education success.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the problem of students dropping out of college or taking a leave of absence midway, especially in the early stage after enrollment. Specifically, the research focuses on the following two main research questions:
1. **Which students are most likely to drop out, and what common characteristics do they have?**
- By analyzing factors such as academic performance, demographic characteristics, admission criteria, and economic status, understand which factors can predict the risk of students dropping out.
2. **Can these common characteristics be used to predict the risk of students dropping out?**
- Use machine - learning techniques to develop a prediction model, evaluate the possibility of students dropping out in the early stage of college, thereby helping schools implement early - intervention strategies, support high - risk students, and improve the overall success rate of higher education.
### Research Background
According to the abstract and introduction of the paper, many higher - education institutions in the United States face the problem of a high student dropout rate. Although the enrollment rate is increasing, a large number of students leave school without completing their degrees. For example, in 2013, there were 29 million people with some college education but no degree, and by 2018 this number had increased to 36 million. Therefore, understanding the potential factors that lead to student dropout and developing effective strategies to prevent dropout are crucial for improving the graduation rate and ensuring student success.
### Research Methods
1. **Data Collection**:
- Use the enrollment and degree records of Eastern Michigan University (EMU) from 2013 to 2017.
- The collected data include retention rate, semester GPA, credit hours (SCH) earned in the semester, ACT scores, high - school GPA (decision GPA), low - income family identification, etc.
2. **Correlation Analysis**:
- Calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between academic performance (such as semester GPA and SCH) and the retention rate.
- Analyze the relationship between admission criteria (such as ACT scores and decision GPA) and the retention rate.
- Consider the influence of demographic characteristics (such as age, gender, race) and economic status (such as low - income family) on the retention rate.
3. **Prediction Model**:
- Develop a prediction model based on XGBoost to predict the retention of students in the second semester.
- Deal with the data imbalance problem and use the SMOTE technique to ensure that the minority class (dropout) samples are fully represented.
### Main Findings
1. **Academic Performance**:
- There is a strong positive correlation between semester GPA and SCH and the retention rate. Students with good academic performance are more likely to continue their studies.
- For example, the retention rate of students with a semester GPA over 3.5 in the second semester is 89%, while that of students with a GPA below 1.0 is only 13%.
2. **Admission Criteria**:
- Students with high ACT scores and decision GPA have a higher retention rate.
- For example, the retention rate of students with an ACT score over 30 in the second semester is 83%, while that of students with an ACT score between 12 - 17 is 64%.
3. **Demographic Characteristics**:
- There is no significant correlation between age, gender, and race and the dropout rate.
4. **Economic Status**:
- The retention rate of students from low - income families is slightly higher than that of students from non - low - income families at each follow - up point, which may be due to support programs for low - income students.
### Conclusion
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a data - driven approach to understand and predict student dropout. By analyzing academic performance, demographic characteristics, and admission criteria, schools can identify high - risk students and implement early - intervention strategies, thereby improving the overall success rate of students. These strategies include providing academic support services, financial aid counseling, and designing projects integrated into the academic community.