Abstract:Identifying the factors that influence student academic performance is essential to provide timely and effective support interventions. The data collected during enrolment and after commencement into a course provide an important source of information to assist with identifying potential risk indicators associated with poor academic performance and attrition. Both predictive and descriptive data mining techniques have been applied on educational data to discover the significant reasons behind student performance. These techniques have their own advantages and limitations. For example, predictive techniques tend to maximise accuracy for correctly classifying students, while the descriptive techniques simply search for interesting student features without considering their academic outcome. Subgroup discovery is a data mining method which takes the advantages of both predictive and descriptive approaches. This study uses subgroup discovery to extract significant factors of student performance for a certain outcome (Pass or Fail). In this work, we have utilised student demographic and academic data recorded at enrolment, as well as course assessment and participation data retrieved from the institution’s learning management system (Moodle) to detect the factors affecting student performance. The results have demonstrated the effectiveness of the subgroup discovery method in general in identifying the factors, and the pros and cons of some popular subgroup discovery algorithms used in this research. From the experiments, it has been found that students, who have indigent socio-economic background or been admitted based on special entry requirement, are most likely to fail. The experiments on Moodle data have revealed that students having lower level of access to the course resources and forum have higher possibility of being unsuccessful. From the combined data, we have identified some interesting subgroups which are not detected using enrolment or Moodle data separately. It has been found that those students, who study off-campus or part-time and have a low level of contributions to the course learning activities, are more likely to be the low-performing students.

Determinants of Student Attrition in an Undergraduate Sport and Exercise Science Degree

Using machine learning to predict student retention from socio-demographic characteristics and app-based engagement metrics

Why Do Students Drop Out? University Dropout Prediction and Associated Factor Analysis Using Machine Learning Techniques

AI-Driven Strategies for Reducing Student Withdrawal -- A Study of EMU Student Stopout

Equal opportunities for non-traditional students? Dropout at a private German distance university of applied sciences

Student Dropout Risk Assessment in Undergraduate Course at Residential University

Predicting Student Dropout in Higher Education

Identifying key factors of student academic performance by subgroup discovery

Stem-ming the Tide: Predicting STEM attrition using student transcript data

Identifying attrition risk based on the first year experience

Predictive modelling of student dropout risk: Practical insights from a South Korean distance university

Examining significant predictors of students’ intention to drop out

Students Success Modeling: Most Important Factors

College Student Retention: When Do We Losing Them?

Has the open door become a revolving door? The impact on attrition of moving from elite to mass higher education

Analysis of First-Year University Student Dropout through Machine Learning Models: A Comparison between Universities

Linking early alert systems and student retention: a survival analysis approach

Predicting special forces dropout via explainable machine learning

Student mental health and dropout from higher education: an analysis of Australian administrative data

Supporting Decision-Making Process on Higher Education Dropout by Analyzing Academic, Socioeconomic, and Equity Factors through Machine Learning and Survival Analysis Methods in the Latin American Context

Students' early departure intentions and the mitigating role of support