Abstract:Population-level analyses are inherently complex due to a myriad of latent confounding effects that underlie the interdisciplinary topics of research interest. Despite the mounting demand for generative population models, the limited generalizability to underrepresented groups hinders their widespread adoption in downstream applications. Interpretability and reliability are essential for clinicians and policymakers, while accuracy and precision are prioritized from an engineering standpoint. Thus, in domains such as population neuroscience, the challenge lies in determining a suitable approach to model population data effectively. Notably, the traditional strata-agnostic nature of existing methods in this field reveals a pertinent gap in quantitative techniques that directly capture major sources of population stratification. The emergence of population-scale cohorts, like the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study, provides unparalleled opportunities to explore and characterize neurobehavioral and sociodemographic relationships comprehensively. We propose diversity-aware population modeling, a framework poised to standardize systematic incorporation of diverse attributes, structured with respect to intrinsic population stratification to obtain holistic insights. Here, we leverage Bayesian multilevel regression and poststratification, to elucidate inter-individual differences in the relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and cognitive development. We constructed 14 varying-intercepts and varying-slopes models to investigate 3 cognitive phenotypes and 5 sociodemographic variables (SDV), across 17 US states and 5 race subgroups. SDVs exhibited systemic socio-spatial effects that served as fundamental drivers of variation in cognitive outcomes. Low SES was disproportionately associated with cognitive development among Black and Hispanic children, while high SES was a robust predictor of cognitive development only among White and Asian children, consistent with the minorities' diminished returns (MDRs) theory. Notably, adversity-susceptible subgroups demonstrated an expressive association with fluid cognition compared to crystallized cognition. Poststratification proved effective in correcting group attribution biases, particularly in Pennsylvania, highlighting sampling discrepancies in US states with the highest percentage of marginalized participants in the ABCD Study©. Our collective analyses underscore the inextricable link between race and geographic location within the US. We emphasize the importance of diversity-aware population models that consider the intersectional composition of society to derive precise and interpretable insights across applicable domains.

Facilitating heterogeneous effect estimation via statistically efficient categorical modifiers

Regression with race-modifiers: towards equity and interpretability

Exploring Heterogeneity in Clinical Trials with Latent Class Analysis

A powerful approach to the study of moderate effect modification in observational studies

Heterogeneous Heterogeneity by Default: Testing Categorical Moderators in Random-effects Meta-Analysis

abc: an R package for Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC)

A Random-effects Approach to Regression Involving Many Categorical Predictors and Their Interactions

Reducing multi-collinearity in GLMS with categorical covariates

Diversity-aware Population Models: Quantifying Associations between Socio-Spatial Factors and Cognitive Development in the ABCD Cohort

Comparing the efficacy of fixed effect and MAIHDA models in predicting outcomes for intersectional social strata

Reconciling Heterogeneous Effects in Causal Inference

A groupwise approach for inferring heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference

Identifying Optimal Methods for Addressing Confounding Bias When Estimating the Effects of State-Level Policies

Multi-CATE: Multi-Accurate Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Robust to Unknown Covariate Shifts

An Overview of Modern Machine Learning Methods for Effect Measure Modification Analyses in High-Dimensional Settings

CATE meets ML -- The Conditional Average Treatment Effect and Machine Learning

Inferential Tools for Assessing Dependence Across Response Categories in Multinomial Models with Discrete Random Effects

Data aggregation can lead to biased inferences in Bayesian linear mixed models and Bayesian analysis of variance.

Detection of latent heteroscedasticity and group-based regression effects in linear models via Bayesian model selection

Heterogeneous causal effects with imperfect compliance: a Bayesian machine learning approach

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data