Abstract:Background: Increasing attention is being given to assessing treatment effect heterogeneity among individuals belonging to qualitatively different latent subgroups. Inference routinely proceeds by first partitioning the individuals into subgroups, then estimating the subgroup-specific average treatment effects. However, because the subgroups are only latently associated with the observed variables, the actual individual subgroup memberships are rarely known with certainty in practice and thus have to be imputed. Ignoring the uncertainty in the imputed memberships precludes misclassification errors, potentially leading to biased results and incorrect conclusions. Methods: We propose a strategy for assessing the sensitivity of inference to classification uncertainty when using such classify-analyze approaches for subgroup effect analyses. We exploit each individual's typically nonzero predictive or posterior subgroup membership probabilities to gauge the stability of the resultant subgroup-specific average causal effects estimates over different, carefully selected subsets of the individuals. Because the membership probabilities are subject to sampling variability, we propose Monte Carlo confidence intervals that explicitly acknowledge the imprecision in the estimated subgroup memberships via perturbations using a parametric bootstrap. The proposal is widely applicable and avoids stringent causal or structural assumptions that existing bias-adjustment or bias-correction methods rely on. Results: Using two different publicly available real-world datasets, we illustrate how the proposed strategy supplements existing latent subgroup effect analyses to shed light on the potential impact of classification uncertainty on inference. First, individuals are partitioned into latent subgroups based on their medical and health history. Then within each fixed latent subgroup, the average treatment effect is assessed using an augmented inverse propensity score weighted estimator. Finally, utilizing the proposed sensitivity analysis reveals different subgroup-specific effects that are mostly insensitive to potential misclassification. Conclusions: Our proposed sensitivity analysis is straightforward to implement, provides both graphical and numerical summaries, and readily permits assessing the sensitivity of any machine learning-based causal effect estimator to classification uncertainty. We recommend making such sensitivity analyses more routine in latent subgroup effect analyses.

Exploring Heterogeneity in Clinical Trials with Latent Class Analysis

Latent Class Analysis: An Alternative Perspective on Subgroup Analysis in Prevention and Treatment

Subgroup identification in clinical trials: an overview of available methods and their implementations with R

Label Switching in Latent Class Analysis: Accuracy of Classification, Parameter Estimates, and Confidence Intervals

Degree-heterogeneous Latent Class Analysis for High-dimensional Discrete Data

Using Data Augmentation to Obtain Standard Errors and Conduct Hypothesis Tests in Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis.

Evaluating sensitivity to classification uncertainty in latent subgroup effect analyses

Latent Class Analysis with Semi-parametric Proportional Hazards Submodel for Time-to-event Data

Application of Latent Class Analysis

Hierarchical Cluster Analysis In Clinical Research With Heterogeneous Study Population: Highlighting Its Visualization With R

Latent Class Modeling with A Time-To-Event Distal Outcome: A Comparison of One, Two and Three-Step Approaches

ASSESSING THE TREATMENT EFFECT HETEROGENEITY WITH A LATENT VARIABLE

Mixture of Latent Trait Analyzers for Model-Based Clustering of Categorical Data

A joint latent class model of longitudinal and survival data with a time-varying membership probability

Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity Using Latent Profile Analysis: A Monte Carlo Simulation

Efficient Targeted Learning of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Multiple Subgroups

Comparing Approaches to Treatment Effect Estimation for Subgroups in Clinical Trials

Tutorial in biostatistics: data‐driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials

Subgroup Analysis Using Bernoulli-gated Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts Models.

Latent variable mixture modeling in psychiatric research – a review and application

Latent Treatment Pattern Discovery for Clinical Processes