Geometric phase evolution

Nathan Hagen,Luis Garza-Soto

2024-07-29

Abstract:Geometric phase has historically been defined using closed cycles of polarization states, often derived using differential geometry on the Poincare sphere. Using the recently-developed wave model of geometric phase, we show that it is better to define geometric phase more generally, allowing every polarized wave to have a well-defined value at any point in its path. Using several example systems, we show how this approach provides more insight into the wave's behavior. Moreover, by tracking the continuous evolution of geometric phase as a wave propagates through an optical system, we encounter a natural explanation of why the conventional Poincare sphere solid angle method uses geodesic paths rather than physical paths of the polarization state.

Optics,Classical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the limitations of the existing definitions of geometric phase. Specifically:

1. **Limitations of the existing definitions**:
- The existing definitions of geometric phase are usually based on the polarization state of a closed loop, which restricts our comprehensive understanding of the behavior of waves during propagation. For example, if the geometric phase is only defined when the loop is completed, it is impossible to describe the phase change of the wave between the starting point and the ending point.
- In experimental systems, almost no completely closed paths exist, so the requirement of using closed paths may be unclear in practical applications.

2. **The proposed new method**:
- The paper proposes a new method for defining geometric phase, which allows each polarized wave to have a clearly defined geometric phase value at any point during propagation. This method provides more abundant information on physical behavior by continuously tracking the changes of geometric phase.
- The new definition method not only retains the information of traditional cyclic paths but also expands the ability to analyze the geometric phase of non - closed paths.

3. **Specific objectives**:
- Explain why the traditional Poincaré sphere solid - angle method uses geodesic paths instead of physical paths.
- Propose and verify new rules to handle the interactions between different optical elements and coordinate transformations.
- Through specific example systems, show how the new method can provide deeper insights into wave behavior.

4. **Mathematical and physical backgrounds**:
- Use Jones matrices and simple basis transformations to analyze the conversion of polarization states, ensuring that the geometric phase has a clear physical meaning at each step.
- By decomposing optical elements into multiple thin elements, analyze in detail the changes of polarization states at each step, thereby revealing the continuous evolution process of the geometric phase.

Through these methods, the paper aims to provide a more general and flexible definition of geometric phase to better understand and describe the behavior of light waves in complex optical systems.