Abstract:In an increasingly dynamic and modern market, the recurrence of unexpected events necessitates proactive responses from information system (IS) stakeholders. Each IS actor strives to legitimize its actions and communicate its strategy. This study delves into the realm of IS legitimation, focusing on the communication of two key stakeholders: IS consultancy companies and international organizations, particularly in the context of unexpected events. To achieve this objective, we examined a diverse array of publications released by both actors. Employing a topic modeling methodology, we analyzed these documents to extract valuable insights regarding their methods of legitimation. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the legitimation discourse literature by offering an exploration of two key IS stakeholders responding to the challenges posed by unexpected events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **In the context of information systems, how do consulting firms and international organizations establish and maintain the legitimacy of their actions through communication in the face of unexpected events?** Specifically, the author focuses on the different communication strategies adopted by these two types of stakeholders when dealing with unexpected events, as well as the motives, intentions, and methods behind them.
### Research Background and Problems
1. **Market Dynamics and the Frequent Occurrence of Unexpected Events**:
- In the modern fast - changing market environment, the impact of unexpected events (such as cybersecurity vulnerabilities, technical failures, delays, etc.) on information systems (IS) is becoming increasingly significant.
- These unexpected events require all stakeholders in the information system (such as users, managers, suppliers, regulatory agencies, etc.) to make timely and effective responses.
2. **The Importance of Legitimizing Communication**:
- All stakeholders (especially information system consulting firms and international organizations) need to prove the legitimacy of their actions through legitimizing communication and convey their strategic decisions.
- Effective communication can not only enhance the trust of stakeholders but also promote internal collaboration within the organization and external support.
3. **Research Gap**:
- Although previous research has shown the importance of communication in information systems, in the context of unexpected events, there is relatively little research on how information system consulting firms and international organizations conduct legitimizing communication.
- The academic community has emphasized the importance of filling this research gap, especially in the analysis of legitimizing discourse.
### Research Objectives
This research aims to fill the above - mentioned research gap in the following ways:
- **Explore the communication strategies of information system consulting firms and international organizations when dealing with unexpected events**.
- **Analyze the motives, intentions, and methods implied behind these strategies**.
- **Compare the differences between the two types of stakeholders** to reveal their uniqueness in legitimizing communication.
### Methodology
To achieve the above - mentioned objectives, the author adopts the method of **Topic Modeling**, and the specific steps are as follows:
1. **Material Selection**:
- Collected and analyzed relevant documents of information system consulting firms and international organizations published between 2020 and 2023.
- Used keyword searches (such as "information system", "unexpected event", "interruption", etc.) to screen out eligible documents.
2. **Text Pre - processing**:
- Removed references, citations, URLs, HTML tags, punctuation marks, and numbers, and converted all words to lowercase.
- Used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) technology for topic modeling, assuming that each document is composed of multiple topics, and each topic is composed of different words.
3. **Data Analysis and Interpretation**:
- Through topic - modeling analysis, extracted the legitimizing communication strategies involved in the documents.
- Compared the communication methods of information system consulting firms and international organizations when dealing with unexpected events, and explored the logic and motives behind them.
### Conclusion
Through in - depth analysis of the communication strategies of information system consulting firms and international organizations in unexpected events, this research is expected to provide valuable insights for the academic community and practitioners, helping them better understand and support the legitimizing efforts of these organizations in complex environments.