Cryptoeconomics and Tokenomics as Economics: A Survey with Opinions

Kensuke Ito
2024-07-22
Abstract:This paper surveys products and studies on cryptoeconomics and tokenomics from an economic perspective, as these terms are still (i) ill-defined and (ii) disconnected from economic disciplines. We first suggest that they can be novel when integrated; we then conduct a literature review and case study following consensus-building for decentralization and token value for autonomy. Integration requires simultaneous consideration of strategic behavior, spamming, Sybil attacks, free-riding, marginal cost, marginal utility and stabilizers. This survey is the first systematization of knowledge on cryptoeconomics and tokenomics, aiming to bridge the contexts of economics and blockchain.
Computer Science and Game Theory,General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper, "Cryptoeconomics and Tokenomics as Economics: A Survey with Opinions", attempts to solve the following two main problems: 1. **Ill - defined terms**: - The two terms, cryptoeconomics and tokenomics, are often used without clear definitions or distinctions in current literature. This ambiguity makes discussions difficult, especially in an interdisciplinary context. 2. **Disconnection from the discipline of economics**: - Despite being named "economics", cryptoeconomics and tokenomics are disconnected from the traditional discipline of economics. On the one hand, these fields have not fully drawn on economics or previous research attempts to integrate economics and computer science; on the other hand, economists' interest in cryptoeconomics and tokenomics is also limited, despite the significant synergy potential between them. This disconnection has led to the problem of reinventing the wheel, further hindering meaningful discussions. ### Main objectives of the paper To address the above challenges, the author proposes the following objectives: - **Redefine terms**: By reviewing the historical background, propose a new definition to clarify the concepts of cryptoeconomics and tokenomics. - **Systematize knowledge**: Through a review of existing literature and case studies, explore the design of decentralized consensus building and autonomous token value, aiming to bridge the gap between economics and blockchain. ### Methodology The methods adopted by the author include: - **Literature review**: Review previous research related to cryptoeconomics and tokenomics, especially regarding the design of decentralized consensus building and token value. - **Case analysis**: Through case studies of specific protocols and DApps (decentralized applications), explore challenges and solutions in practical applications. - **Integrated perspective**: Integrate cryptoeconomics and tokenomics into an overall framework, emphasizing the importance of mechanism design and reward design. ### Conclusion The author believes that although cryptoeconomics and tokenomics are not novel in their respective fields, when they are integrated together, new insights and innovations can be generated. Therefore, the author suggests integrating these two fields into "token - based mechanism design" to better reflect their interdisciplinary nature and inter - relationships in practical applications. Through these efforts, the author hopes to promote more productive discussions and provide a solid foundation for future research.