Abstract:We show that in the single-parameter mechanism design environment, the only non-wasteful, symmetric, incentive compatible and sybil-proof mechanism is a second price auction with symmetric tie-breaking. Thus, if there is private information, lotteries or other mechanisms that do not always allocate to a highest-value bidder are not sybil-proof or not incentive compatible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of how to design effective, Sybil - proof mechanisms in the presence of Sybil attacks (i.e., a participant creates multiple identities to obtain better mechanism results). Specifically, the paper explores whether there are other Sybil - proof mechanisms besides auctions in the single - parameter mechanism design environment.
### Main problems of the paper
1. **Background of Sybil attacks**:
- In many scenarios, the cost of creating a new identity is low or almost zero, which makes the mechanism vulnerable to Sybil attacks.
- Sybil attacks are recognized as a threat in various situations, such as online voting systems, online auctions, recommendation systems, and blockchain systems.
2. **Research motivation**:
- When allocating private goods, the natural choice is to allocate the goods to the highest bidder. However, this pure auction mechanism may not ensure fairness, wide participation, or other allocation goals.
- For example, in the sale of event tickets, low - priced tickets can give fans with limited budgets an opportunity, but they are also easy targets for scalpers.
- In blockchain systems, randomly allocating block proposal rights helps avoid power concentration, but if different agents have different values for the proposal rights, this may lead to an increase in market concentration.
3. **Core questions**:
- Are there Sybil - proof mechanisms that can achieve incentive compatibility and symmetry when allocating private goods without always allocating the goods to the highest bidder?
- The paper gives a negative answer: in the classic Myersonian mechanism design framework, the only mechanism that satisfies non - wastefulness, symmetry, incentive compatibility, and Sybil - proofness is the second - price auction with a symmetric tie - breaking rule.
### Main conclusions
- **Uniqueness theorem**: In the single - parameter mechanism design environment, the only mechanism that satisfies non - wastefulness, symmetry, incentive compatibility, and Sybil - proofness is the second - price auction with a symmetric tie - breaking rule.
- **Formula representation**: According to Myerson's lemma, the payment rule is defined by the following formula:
\[
p_j(v) := v_j \cdot x_j(v_j, v_{-j}) - \int_0^{v_j} x_j(z, v_{-j}) \, dz
\]
- **Monotonicity requirement**: For each finite set of agents \( N \), the function \( x^N \) is non - decreasing on its domain.
- **Sybil - proofness**: For each finite \( N \subseteq \mathbb{N} \), \( i \in N \), \( j \in \mathbb{N} \setminus N \), \( v \in \mathbb{R}_+^N \) and bid \( u \geq 0 \), we have:
\[
v_i x_i^N(v) - p_i^N(v) \geq v_i \left( x_i^{N \cup \{j\}}(v, u) + x_j^{N \cup \{j\}}(v, u) \right) - p_i^{N \cup \{j\}}(v, u) - p_j^{N \cup \{j\}}(v, u)
\]
### Significance and impact
- **Allocation of proposal rights in blockchain systems**: If different agents have different values for block proposal rights, any Sybil - proof proposal right allocation mechanism must allocate the rights to the agent with the highest value.
- **General mechanism design**: This result shows that in the presence of private information and the possibility of Sybil attacks, the goods must be allocated to the agent with the highest value to ensure the effectiveness and security of the mechanism.
In conclusion, through strict mathematical proofs, this paper reveals the limitations of designing effective mechanisms in the presence of Sybil attack risks and emphasizes the unique advantages of the second - price auction.