Abstract:We consider the problem of a designer who wants to allocate resources to representatives, that then distribute the resources they receive among the individuals they represent. Motivated by the way Feeding America, one of the largest U.S. charities, allocates donations to food banks, which then further distribute the donations to food-insecure individuals, we focus on mechanisms that use artificial currencies. We compare auctions through the lens of the Price of Anarchy, with respect to three canonical welfare objectives: utilitarian social welfare (sum of individuals' utilities), Nash social welfare (product of individuals' utilities), and egalitarian social welfare (minimum of individuals' utilities). We prove strong lower bounds on the Price of Anarchy of all auctions that allocate each item to the highest bidder, subject to a mild technical constraint; this includes Feeding America's current auction, the First-Price auction. In sharp contrast, our main result shows that adapting the classic Trading Post mechanism of Shapley and Shubik to this setting, and coupled with Feeding America's choice of budget rule (each representative gets an amount of artificial currency equal to the number of individuals it represents), achieves a small Price of Anarchy for all generalized $p$-mean objectives simultaneously. Our bound on the Price of Anarchy of the Trading Post mechanism depends on $\ell$: the product of the rank and the ``incoherence'' of the underlying valuation matrix, which together capture a notion of how ``spread out'' the values of a matrix are. This notion has been extremely influential in the matrix completion literature, and, to the best of our knowledge, has never been used in auction theory prior to our work. Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that the dependence on $\ell$ is necessary: the Price of Anarchy of the Trading Post mechanism is $\Omega(\sqrt{\ell})$.

Exploiting Weak Supermodularity for Coalition-Proof Mechanisms

Robustly Leveraging Collusion in Combinatorial Auctions.

Collusive Dominant-Strategy Truthfulness

Designing Coalition-Proof Reverse Auctions over Continuous Goods

Impossibilities for Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms

A New Approach to Auctions and Resilient Mechanism Design

Knowledge Benchmarks in Adversarial Mechanism Design and Implementation in Surviving Strategies (Part I)

Resilient Knowledge-Based Mechanisms For Truly Combinatorial Auctions (And Implementation in Surviving Strategies)

Breaking the Logarithmic Barrier for Truthful Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular Bidders

Auctioning with Strategically Reticent Bidders

Mechanism Design with Delegated Bidding

Robust Mechanisms for Risk-Averse Sellers

Approximately Efficient Two-Sided Combinatorial Auctions

Leveraging Possibilistic Beliefs in Unrestricted Combinatorial Auctions

Strategy-Proof Multidimensional Mechanism Design

Simple Mechanisms for Profit Maximization in Multi-item Auctions

Submodularity and supermodularity in contest games

Welfare and Profit Maximization with Production Costs

Mechanism Design with Set-Theoretic Beliefs

On Budget-Feasible Mechanism Design for Symmetric Submodular Objectives

When Are Welfare Guarantees Robust?