Effectiveness Study of Calibration and Correction Algorithms on the Prototype of the POLAR-2/LPD Detector

Difan Yi,Qian Liu,Hongbang Liu,Fei Xie,Huanbo Feng,Zuke Feng,Jin Li,Enwei Liang,Yangheng Zheng
2024-07-19
Abstract:Gaseous X-ray polarimetry refers to a class of detectors used for measuring the polarization of soft X-rays. The systematic effects of such detectors introduce residual modulation, leading to systematic biases in the polarization detection results of the source. This paper discusses the systematic effects and their calibration and correction using the Gas Microchannel Plate-Pixel Detector (GMPD) prototype for POLAR-2/Low-Energy X-ray Polarization Detector (LPD). Additionally, we propose an algorithm that combines parameterization with Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian iteration to eliminate residual modulation. The residual modulation after data correction at different energy points has been reduced to below 1%, and a good linear relationship is observed between the polarization degree and modulation degree. The improvement in modulation degree after correction ranges from 2% to 15%, and the results exceed those of the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) above 5 keV.
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Experiment
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problem of systematic effects in soft X - ray polarization measurement, especially the residual modulation caused by these effects, which thus affects the measurement results of polarized sources. Specifically, the paper discusses the systematic effects of POLAR - 2/Low - energy X - ray Polarimeter (LPD) using the Gas Micro - channel Plate - Pixel Detector (GMPD) prototype, as well as its calibration and correction methods. In addition, the authors propose an algorithm that combines parameterization with Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian iteration to eliminate residual modulation. After data correction, the residual modulation at different energy points has been reduced to less than 1%, and a good linear relationship between the degree of polarization and the modulation degree has been observed. The improvement range of the corrected modulation degree is between 2% and 15%, and its results outperform those of the Imaging X - ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) above 5 keV. ### Main problems solved in the paper: 1. **Residual modulation caused by systematic effects**: The complex structure and high - spatial - resolution sensitivity of the detector, as well as the operating state of the instrument, individual components, and electronic devices may introduce systematic effects. These systematic effects will lead to non - zero modulation when detecting unpolarized sources, that is, residual modulation, which will cause systematic deviations in the measurement results of polarized sources. Especially in low - energy events, due to the short trajectory of low - energy electrons, the influence of residual modulation is more significant and cannot be ignored. 2. **Calibration and correction methods**: The paper proposes several calibration and correction methods, including signal - response calibration, geometric - effect calibration, etc., to reduce or eliminate the residual modulation caused by these systematic effects. Specific methods include: - **Signal - response calibration**: Calibrate pixel - response differences, rolling shutter and signal attenuation, charge - pile - up effects, etc. - **Geometric - effect calibration**: Calibrate pixelization effects, truncation effects, trajectory - image distortion, etc. 3. **Algorithm innovation**: Propose an algorithm that combines parameterization with Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian iteration to eliminate residual modulation. This algorithm can effectively reduce the residual modulation at different energy points and improve the accuracy of the modulation degree. ### Key formulas: 1. **Differential cross - section in the photoelectron emission direction**: \[ \frac{d\sigma_k}{d\Omega} \propto \sin^2\theta \cos^2\phi \left(1 + \beta \cos\theta\right)^2 \] where \(\beta\) is the ratio of the photoelectron emission speed to the speed of light, and \(\theta\) and \(\phi\) are the latitude angle and azimuth angle respectively. 2. **Modulation function**: \[ M(\phi) = A + B \cos^2(\phi - \phi_0) \] where \(\phi_0\) is the polarization phase of the source. The modulation factor \(\mu\) is defined as the proportion of the modulation component in the distribution area: \[ \mu = \frac{B}{2A + B} \] 3. **Pixel - signal attenuation**: \[ A(t) = a \cdot \exp\left(-\frac{t}{b \cdot t + c}\right) \] where \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\) are fitting parameters. Through these methods and algorithms, the paper successfully reduces the residual modulation and improves the accuracy and reliability of soft X - ray polarization measurement.