Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

DP-KAN: Differentially Private Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

PKDGAN: Private Knowledge Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Low-Data Regimes: A Comparative Study with Multilayer Perceptrons

A(DP)$^2$SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

A(DP)$^2$2SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

DKL-KAN: Scalable Deep Kernel Learning using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

F-KANs: Federated Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

Efficient Privacy-Preserving KAN Inference Using Homomorphic Encryption

Improving Differentially Private Models with Active Learning

Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Network

Differentially Private and Adversarially Robust Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation

Differentially Private Knowledge Distillation via Synthetic Text Generation

Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) for Time Series Classification and Robust Analysis

On the Robustness of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: An Adversarial Perspective

On Training of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

A comprehensive and FAIR comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networks

Differentially Private Optimizers Can Learn Adversarially Robust Models

Locally Differentially Private Distributed Deep Learning via Knowledge Distillation