Abstract:Affective polarization and increasing social divisions affect social mixing and the spread of information across online and physical spaces, reinforcing social and electoral cleavages and influencing political outcomes. Here, using aggregated and de-identified co-location and online network data, we investigate the relationship between partisan exposure and voting patterns in the USA by comparing three dimensions of partisan exposure: physical proximity and exposure to the same social contexts, online social ties, and residential sorting. By leveraging various statistical modeling approaches, we consistently find that partisan exposure in the physical space, as captured by co-location patterns, more accurately predicts electoral outcomes in US counties, outperforming online and residential exposures across metropolitan and non-metro areas. Moreover, our results show that physical partisan proximity is the best predictor of voting patterns in swing counties, where the election results are most uncertain. We also estimate county-level experienced partisan segregation and examine its relationship with individuals' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Focusing on metropolitan areas, our results confirm the presence of extensive partisan segregation in the US and show that offline partisan isolation, both considering physical encounters or residential sorting, is higher than online segregation and is primarily associated with educational attainment. Our findings emphasize the importance of physical space in understanding the relationship between social networks and political behavior, in contrast to the intense scrutiny focused on online social networks and elections.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Is partisan contact in physical space more accurate in predicting voting results in the United States than online social networks and places of residence?** Specifically, the research aims to explore the relationships between these factors and voting patterns in U.S. counties by comparing partisan exposure in three dimensions (physical proximity, online social connections, and place of residence).
### Research Background and Problem Statement
1. **Affective Polarization and Social Division**: In recent years, affective polarization and social division have influenced social interaction and information dissemination, especially in physical and cyberspace. This phenomenon has strengthened social and electoral rifts and influenced political outcomes.
2. **The Influence of Online Social Media**: Although many studies have focused on the influence of online social media on opinion dynamics, political polarization, and elections, political polarization and partisan exposure cannot be explained solely by social media behavior. They are also comprehensively influenced by all aspects of an individual's daily life, including the physical and online environments.
3. **Multidimensional Analysis of Partisan Exposure**: In order to more comprehensively understand how partisan exposure affects voting behavior, analysis needs to be carried out from multiple dimensions, including physical proximity (such as co - presence at the same location), online social connections (such as friendships on Facebook), and place of residence (such as neighborhood relationships). However, there is currently a lack of systematic comparison of the relationships between these different dimensions.
### Research Objectives
- **Compare Partisan Exposure in Different Dimensions**: Using aggregated and anonymized co - occurrence data and online network data, the researchers compared the effects of physical proximity, online social connections, and place of residence on voting patterns in U.S. counties.
- **Evaluate Predictive Ability**: Through various statistical modeling methods, the researchers evaluated which dimension can most accurately predict voting results, especially in swing counties, where election results are the most uncertain.
- **Explore the Relationship between Partisan Segregation and Demographic Characteristics**: The researchers also estimated the degree of partisan segregation in each county and examined its relationship with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, especially educational level and urban - rural differences.
### Main Findings
1. **The Importance of Physical Proximity**: The study found that partisan exposure in physical space (captured through co - occurrence patterns) performs best in predicting voting results in U.S. counties, both in urban and non - urban areas, better than online and place - of - residence exposure.
2. **Significant Differences in Swing Counties**: In swing counties, physical proximity is significantly better than other dimensions and can better predict voting results.
3. **The Degree of Partisan Segregation**: The study also found that offline partisan segregation (including co - occurrence and place - of - residence segregation) is higher than online segregation and is mainly related to educational level. Offline partisan segregation is more obvious in large - city areas. In particular, people with higher education levels are more likely to be exposed to Democratic voters, while those with lower education levels are more likely to be exposed to Republican voters.
4. **The Influence of Urban - Rural Differences**: Urban - rural differences significantly affect offline and place - of - residence partisan segregation, and rural areas in large cities are more inclined to Republican voter segregation.
### Conclusion
This study emphasizes the importance of physical space in understanding the relationship between social networks and political behavior, especially in predicting voting results. The research results show that partisan exposure in physical space is the most important predictor, surpassing the influence of online social networks and place of residence. In addition, the study also reveals the crucial roles of educational level and urban - rural differences in partisan segregation.
Through these findings, the study provides a new perspective for understanding the relationship between social exposure and political outcomes, especially in terms of the interaction between physical and online spaces.