Abstract:Background: Social media chatter in 2020 has been largely dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Existing research shows that COVID-19 discourse is highly politicized, with political preferences linked to beliefs and disbeliefs about the virus. As it happens with topics that become politicized, people may fall into echo chambers, which is the idea that one is only presented with information they already agree with, thereby reinforcing one's confirmation bias. Understanding the relationship between information dissemination and political preference is crucial for effective public health communication. Objective: We aimed to study the extent of polarization and examine the structure of echo chambers related to COVID-19 discourse on Twitter in the United States. Methods: First, we presented Retweet-BERT, a scalable and highly accurate model for estimating user polarity by leveraging language features and network structures. Then, by analyzing the user polarity predicted by Retweet-BERT, we provided new insights into the characterization of partisan users. Results: We observed that right-leaning users were noticeably more vocal and active in the production and consumption of COVID-19 information. We also found that most of the highly influential users were partisan, which may contribute to further polarization. Importantly, while echo chambers exist in both the right- and left-leaning communities, the right-leaning community was by far more densely connected within their echo chamber and isolated from the rest. Conclusions: We provided empirical evidence that political echo chambers are prevalent, especially in the right-leaning community, which can exacerbate the exposure to information in line with pre-existing users' views. Our findings have broader implications in developing effective public health campaigns and promoting the circulation of factual information online.

Transformation of social relationships in COVID-19 America: Remote communication may amplify political echo chambers

An Exploration Study on the Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Q&A Communities

Effect of homophily and correlation of beliefs on COVID-19 and general infectious disease outbreaks

Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research

The crowding of social distancing: How social context and interpersonal connections affect individual responses to the coronavirus*

Can the social network bridge social distancing? Social media use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Communities Going Virtual: Examining the Roles of Online and Offline Social Capital in Pandemic Perceived Community Resilience-Building

Social and parasocial relationships during COVID-19 social distancing

Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study

Did COVID-19 Blur Partisan Boundaries? A Comparison of Partisan Affinity and Source Heterophily in Online Alternative News-Sharing Networks Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited

Social Isolation, Digital Connection: COVID-19's Impact on Twitter Ego Networks

Putting the social back into physical distancing: The role of digital connections in a pandemic crisis

Social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of long-term connectedness and cumulative inequality in later life

COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization

The effect of co-location on human communication networks

Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic

Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Personal Network Protects, Social Media Harms: Evidence from Two Surveys During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Relationship difficulties and "technoference" during the COVID-19 pandemic

Why People Became Hostile during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Social Media Use, Blame Attribution, and Collective Efficacy