Abstract:Local social interactions among individuals in animal groups generate collective behavior, allowing groups to adjust to changing conditions. Historically, scientists from different disciplines have taken different approaches to modeling collective behavior. We describe how each can contribute to the goal of understanding natural systems. Simple bottom-up models that describe individuals and their interactions directly have demonstrated that local interactions far from equilibrium can generate collective states. However, such simple models are not likely to describe accurately the actual mechanisms and interactions in play in any real biological system. Other classes of top-down models that describe group-level behavior directly have been proposed for groups where the function of the collective behavior is understood. Such models cannot necessarily explain why or how such functions emerge from first principles. Because modeling approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and no single approach will always be best, we argue that models of collective behavior that are aimed at understanding real biological systems should be formulated to address specific questions and to allow for validation. As examples, we discuss four forms of collective behavior that differ both in the interactions that produce the collective behavior and in ecological context, and thus require very different modeling frameworks. 1) Harvester ants use local interactions consisting of brief antennal contact, in which one ant assesses the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of another, to regulate foraging activity, which can be modeled as a closed-loop excitable system. 2) Arboreal turtle ants form trail networks in the canopy of the tropical forest, using trail pheromone; one ant detects the volatile chemical that another has recently deposited. The process that maintains and repairs the trail, which can be modeled as a distributed algorithm, is constrained by the physical configuration of the network of vegetation in which they travel. 3) Swarms of midges interact acoustically and non-locally, and can be well described as agents moving in an emergent potential well that is representative of the swarm as a whole rather than individuals. 4) Flocks of jackdaws change their effective interactions depending on ecological context, using topological distance when traveling but metric distance when mobbing. We discuss how different research questions about these systems have led to different modeling approaches.

Methods for quantifying self-organization in biology: a forward-looking survey and tutorial

Self-organized patterns and traffic flow in Colonies of organisms: from bacteria and social insects to vertebrates

Quantifying different modeling frameworks using topological data analysis: a case study with zebrafish patterns

Topological data analysis of zebrafish patterns

Lessons Learned from Quantitative Dynamical Modeling in Systems Biology

Collective Information Processing and Pattern Formation in swarms, flocks and crowds

Spatial patterns in ecological systems: from microbial colonies to landscapes

Phase Transitions and Criticality in the Collective Behavior of Animals -- Self-organization and biological function

A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions

Quantifying the intricacies of biological pattern formation: A new perspective through complexity measures

Goals and Limitations of Modeling Collective Behavior in Biological Systems

A mathematical approach to territorial pattern formation

Mathematical models for chemotaxis and their applications in self-organisation phenomena

Ants, robots, humans: a self-organizing, complex systems modeling approach

Transitions between Localised Patterns with Different Spatial Symmetries in Non-Local Hyperbolic Models for Self-Organised Biological Aggregations

A unifying method-based classification of robot swarm spatial self-organisation behaviours

Modeling self-organized systems interacting with few individuals: from microscopic to macroscopic dynamics

The Influences of Self-Introspection and Credit Evaluation on Self-Organized Flocking

Self-Organization and Information Processing: From Basic Enzymatic Activities to Complex Adaptive Cellular Behavior

Bacterial self-organisation and computation

Quantifying behavior to understand the brain