Exploring Generative AI Policies in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA

Qin Xie,Ming Li,Ariunaa Enkhtur

2024-07-12

Abstract:This study conducts a comparative analysis of national policies on Generative AI across four countries: China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA. Employing the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method, it examines the responses of these nations to Generative AI in higher education settings, scrutinizing the diversity in their approaches within this group. While all four countries exhibit a positive attitude toward Generative AI in higher education, Japan and the USA prioritize a human-centered approach and provide direct guidance in teaching and learning. In contrast, China and Mongolia prioritize national security concerns, with their guidelines focusing more on the societal level rather than being specifically tailored to education. Additionally, despite all four countries emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion, they consistently fail to clearly discuss or implement measures to address the digital divide. By offering a comprehensive comparative analysis of attitudes and policies regarding Generative AI in higher education across these countries, this study enriches existing literature and provides policymakers with a global perspective, ensuring that policies in this domain promote inclusion rather than exclusion.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the different responses and methodological differences in the policies of four countries—China, Japan, Mongolia, and the United States—regarding Generative AI in higher education. Specifically, the study examines the policies and attitudes these countries adopt when applying Generative AI to higher education through Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).

The main research questions include:
1. How do these four countries respond to the application of Generative AI in higher education?
2. How do their methods of applying Generative AI in higher education differ?

Through a comparative analysis of policy documents from the four countries, the study reveals different focal points in the application of Generative AI: the United States and Japan emphasize a human-centered approach and directly guide teaching and learning; whereas China and Mongolia are more concerned with national security issues, with their guidelines focusing more on the societal level rather than specifically on education. Additionally, although all four countries emphasize diversity, equity, and inclusion, there are still shortcomings in the actual discussion and implementation of measures to address the digital divide.

Overall, this study provides a comparative analysis of attitudes and policies regarding Generative AI in higher education, contributing to the existing literature and offering policymakers a global perspective to ensure that relevant policy measures promote inclusion rather than exclusion.