Abstract:This study aims to develop an AI education policy for higher education by examining the perceptions and implications of text generative AI technologies. Data was collected from 457 students and 180 teachers and staff across various disciplines in Hong Kong universities, using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Based on the findings, the study proposes an AI Ecological Education Policy Framework to address the multifaceted implications of AI integration in university teaching and learning. This framework is organized into three dimensions: Pedagogical, Governance, and Operational. The Pedagogical dimension concentrates on using AI to improve teaching and learning outcomes, while the Governance dimension tackles issues related to privacy, security, and accountability. The Operational dimension addresses matters concerning infrastructure and training. The framework fosters a nuanced understanding of the implications of AI integration in academic settings, ensuring that stakeholders are aware of their responsibilities and can take appropriate actions accordingly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the following issues:
1. **Formulating AI Education Policies**: By investigating the perceptions and applications of generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) among students, teachers, and staff at the University of Hong Kong, the study proposes an AI ecological education policy framework for higher education. This framework aims to address the multifaceted impacts of integrating AI into the teaching process.
2. **Addressing Academic Integrity Challenges**: With the proliferation of generative AI tools, students may use these tools to cheat or plagiarize assignments. The study found that nearly one-third of students had used AI to complete coursework, raising concerns about academic integrity and prompting some universities to consider banning such tools or enhancing regulatory measures.
3. **Improving Teaching Quality and Efficiency**: Despite potential risks, AI also holds the promise of revolutionizing education methods, such as providing personalized feedback to support student learning, helping to identify weaknesses, and improving skills.
4. **Ensuring Ethical and Technical Standards**: The research emphasizes the importance of formulating relevant policies to ensure the reasonable and ethical use of AI technology in education. This includes aspects such as privacy protection, security, and accountability.
5. **Balancing Technological Advancement and Humanistic Care**: Although AI technology is rapidly developing, effectively integrating it into the education system while maintaining the core values of traditional teaching models (such as teacher-student relationships) remains an urgent issue to be addressed.
In summary, this paper proposes an AI education policy framework covering the three dimensions of pedagogy, governance, and operations, based on data collected through a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods, with the aim of promoting the healthy development of AI technology in the field of higher education.