Invariant inter-subject relational structures in the human visual cortex

Ofer Lipman,Shany Grossman,Doron Friedman,Yacov Hel-Or,Rafael Malach
2024-07-12
Abstract:It is a fundamental behavior that different individuals see the world in a largely similar manner. This is an essential basis for humans' ability to cooperate and communicate. However, what are the neuronal properties that underlie these inter-subject commonalities of our visual world? Finding out what aspects of neuronal coding remain invariant across individuals' brains will shed light not only on this fundamental question but will also point to the neuronal coding scheme as the basis of visual perception. Here, we address this question by obtaining intracranial recordings from three cohorts of patients taking part in a different visual recognition task (overall 19 patients and 244 high-order visual contacts included in the analyses) and examining the neuronal coding scheme most consistent across individuals' visual cortex. Our results highlight relational coding - expressed by the set of similarity distances between profiles of pattern activations - as the most consistent representation across individuals. Alternative coding schemes, such as population vector coding or linear coding, failed to achieve similar inter-subject consistency. Our results thus support relational coding as the central neuronal code underlying individuals' shared perceptual content in the human brain.
Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the neural coding mechanisms of visual perception are consistent among different individuals, that is, whether there are common structures or features in the neural activity patterns of different people's brains when processing visual information. Specifically, what the researchers want to know is which aspects of neural coding remain unchanged in different individuals and how these invariants support the shared visual world of people and their ability to cooperate and communicate based on it. To explore this problem, the research team compared the similarities among three possible neural coding schemes - activation pattern coding, relational coding, and linear coding - among different individuals by analyzing the intracranial recording data of epilepsy patients when performing visual recognition tasks. These three coding schemes represent different hypotheses respectively: 1. **Activation Pattern Coding**: It is hypothesized that the direction of the neuron activation vector caused by a specific visual stimulus remains consistent among different individuals. This means that if two individuals see the same image, the corresponding neuron activation patterns in their brains should be the same or proportional. 2. **Relational Coding**: It is hypothesized that the correlation between the activation vectors of neurons for different objects or concepts, rather than the specific activation vectors themselves, remains invariant across individuals. In this model, the brains of different individuals will retain the relative distances between different stimuli, not just the direction of the activation pattern. 3. **Relational Coding**: It is hypothesized that the perceptual coding is consistent among different individuals but can undergo general linear transformations. This means that there is a general matrix \(M\) such that for each image \(i\), \(M\mathbf{a}_P^i \approx \mathbf{a}_Q^i\), where \(\mathbf{a}_P^i\) and \(\mathbf{a}_Q^i\) represent the activation vectors in the brains of two different individuals for the same image respectively. The research results show that the **Relational Coding** scheme exhibits the highest invariance among different individuals, especially performing better than the other two coding schemes on the validation set. This indicates that relational coding may be the core neural coding mechanism in the human brain that supports shared visual perception. This finding not only helps to understand the neural basis of visual perception but also provides an important theoretical basis for future cognitive science research.