Loss of Axial Symmetry in Hypersonic Flows over Conical Shapes

Irmak T. Karpuzcu,Deborah A. Levin

2024-07-10

Abstract:The assumption of axial symmetry for hypersonic flows over conically shaped geometries is ubiquitous in both experiments and numerical simulations. Yet depending on the free stream conditions, many of these flows are unsteady and their transition from laminar to turbulent is a three-dimensional phenomena. Combining triple deck theory/linear stability analysis with the kinetic direct simulation Monte Carlo method we analyze the azimuthal eigenmodes of flows over single and double-cone configurations. For Mach 16 flows we find that the strongest amplification rate occurs for the non-axisymmetric azimuthal wavenumber of n = 1. This occurs in regions quite close to the tip of the cone due to the proximity of the conical shock to the viscous shear layer where non-axisymmetric modes are amplified through linear mechanisms. Comparison of triple deck linear stability predictions shows that in addition to the azimuthal wavenumber, both the temporal content and amplification rate of these non-axisymmetric disturbances agree well with the time accurate DSMC flowfield. In addition to the loss of axial symmetry observed at the conical shock, the effect of axial symmetry assumptions on the more complex shock-shock and shock-boundary layer interactions of a flow over a double cone are considered. The results for the separation region show that axisymmetric and three dimensional simulations differ in almost all of the main flow structures. Three dimensional flowfields result in a smaller separation bubble with weaker shocks and three dimensional effects were manifest in the variation in surface parameters in the azimuthal direction as well. Interestingly, the DSMC simulations show that the loss of axial symmetry in the separation region, begins near the cone tip.

Fluid Dynamics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: when hypersonic fluid passes through a conical object, whether the axisymmetry assumption is still applicable, especially in the area close to the tip of the cone. Specifically, the author focuses on whether the instabilities in these fluid flows and their transition processes from laminar to turbulent flows are indeed three - dimensional phenomena, and how these three - dimensional effects influence the flow structure and characteristics.

### Problem Background

1. **Traditional Assumptions and Actual Differences**
- In experiments and numerical simulations, it is usually assumed that the flow of hypersonic fluid passing through a conical object is axisymmetric.
- However, depending on the free - stream conditions, many such flows are actually unstable, and their transition from laminar to turbulent flows is a three - dimensional phenomenon.

2. **Research Motivation**
- Although many experimental and theoretical studies have shown that the instabilities of the flow and the turbulent transition have three - dimensional characteristics, most of the literature still ignores this point.
- The author hopes to explore the importance of these three - dimensional effects in hypersonic flows through single - cone and double - cone configurations by combining the triple - deck theory/linear stability analysis (TDT/LSA) with the direct simulation Monte Carlo method (DSMC).

### Main Problems

- **Loss of Axisymmetry**: The research aims to determine whether axisymmetry is indeed lost when hypersonic fluid passes through a conical object, especially in the area close to the tip of the cone.
- **Amplification of Non - Axisymmetric Modes**: By analyzing modes with different azimuthal wavenumbers, the research finds that for a Mach 16 flow, the strongest amplification occurs at the non - axisymmetric azimuthal wavenumber \(n = 1\).
- **Influence of Three - Dimensional Effects**: The research also explores how three - dimensional effects influence more complex shock - shock and shock - boundary - layer interactions, especially in double - cone configurations.

### Formula Representation

The formulas involved in the paper are presented in Markdown format as follows:

- Equations (1) and (2) describe axisymmetric and non - axisymmetric perturbations respectively:
\[
\frac{A_i'(\xi_0)}{\int_{\xi_0}^{\infty} \xi A_i(\xi) d\xi} = - (i\alpha)^{4/3} \frac{I_0(i\alpha r_s) K_0(i\alpha a) - I_0(i\alpha a) K_0(i\alpha r_s)}{I_1(i\alpha r_s) K_0(i\alpha a) - I_1(i\alpha a) K_0(i\alpha r_s)}
\]
\[
\frac{A_i'(\xi_0)}{\int_{\xi_0}^{\infty} \xi A_i(\xi) d\xi} = - (i\alpha)^{4/3} \frac{n^2}{\alpha^2 a^2} \frac{I_n(i\alpha r_s) K_n(i\alpha a) - I_n(i\alpha a) K_n(i\alpha r_s)}{I_n(i\alpha r_s) K_n'(i\alpha a) - I_n'(i\alpha a) K_n(i\alpha r_s)}
\]

- Perturbation form:
\[
E = \exp[i(\alpha S + n\phi - \Omega \tau)]
\]

- Reynolds number calculation:
\[
Re = \frac{\rho U_s^*}{\mu}
\]

- Scaling relationships of dimensionless variables:
\[
a = Re^{-3/8} \mu_w^{3/8} \lambda^{-5/4} T_w^{9/8} M^{-1/4} a
\]
\[
s = 1 + Re^{-3/8} \mu_w^{3/8} \lambda^{-5/4} T_w^{9/8} M^{3/4} S
\]
\[
t = Re^{-1/4} \m