Minds, Brains, AI

Jay Seitz

2024-04-22

Abstract:In the last year or so and going back many decades there has been extensive claims by major computational scientists, engineers, and others that AGI, artificial general intelligence, is five or ten years away, but without a scintilla of scientific evidence, for a broad body of these claims. Computers will become conscious, have a theory of mind, think and reason, will become more intelligent than humans, and so on. But the claims are science fiction, not science. This article reviews evidence for the following three propositions using extensive body of scientific research and related sources from the cognitive and neurosciences, evolutionary evidence, linguistics, data science, comparative psychology, self-driving cars, robotics. and the learning sciences. (1) Do computing machines think or reason? (2) Are computing machines sentient or conscious? (3) Do computing machines have a theory of mind?

Artificial Intelligence,Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve

The paper "Minds, Brains, and AI" attempts to address the main issue of whether the broad claims about artificial intelligence (particularly Artificial General Intelligence, AGI) have scientific basis. Specifically, the paper explores the following three core propositions:

1. **Can computational machines (such as large language models, LLMs) think or reason?**
- The author evaluates whether these machines truly possess the ability to think and reason by analyzing extensive research in fields such as cognitive and neural sciences, evolutionary evidence, linguistics, data science, comparative psychology, autonomous vehicles and robotics, and learning sciences.

2. **Do computational machines have perceptual abilities or consciousness?**
- The author explores whether computational machines can perceive the environment or possess consciousness like biological organisms. This section includes a comparative analysis of consciousness in different species (such as dogs, birds, octopuses, and human infants).

3. **Do computational machines have a "Theory of Mind"?**
- The author discusses whether computational machines can understand the mental states of others, i.e., whether they possess a "Theory of Mind." This part explores how children acquire a "Theory of Mind" and whether other species or computational machines can develop similar abilities.

### Core Views of the Paper

- **Improper use of language**: The author points out that many descriptions of the cognitive and emotional abilities of computational machines are actually metaphorical expressions without scientific evidence. For example, terms like "thinking," "reasoning," and "understanding" are inaccurate when applied to computational machines.

- **Perception and consciousness**: Current computational machines do not possess perceptual abilities or consciousness. They cannot experience sensations or perceive emotions like biological organisms.

- **Theory of Mind**: Computational machines do not possess a "Theory of Mind," meaning they cannot understand the mental states of others. This ability has gradually developed in biological organisms through evolution, and computational machines have not yet reached this level.

- **Nature of cognitive processes**: The author emphasizes that true thinking and reasoning are subjective and conscious processes, while computational machines merely execute algorithms and logical rules without genuine cognitive abilities.

### Conclusion

Through multidisciplinary research and evidence, the paper concludes that current computational machines do not possess true thinking, perception, consciousness, or "Theory of Mind" abilities. The behavior and performance of these machines are more based on algorithms and data processing rather than genuine cognitive processes. Whether future computational machines will possess these abilities remains purely speculative, with no scientific basis to support such claims at present.