Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is a booming academic field with a wide range of application areas and prospects. Many people, including scientists, technologists, engineers, entrepreneurs and even social managers and scholars of humanities and social science, have shown a strong interest and great enthusiasm for AI-related topics, which has become an important phenomenon of contemporary scientific culture. There is a large collection of documents reflecting on and forecasting the development of AI from different angles. Articles in this special issue, contributed by authors from Shanxi University, reflect the authors’ distinctive and authentic thoughts, aiming to add something new to the database of AI-related documents. Modern science, born during the Renaissance, is the most powerful culture that has transformed humanity and its society. Theoretically, that power comes mainly from science itself, which pursues objective and novel knowledge, is based on solid evidence and rigorous logic and has an inherent self-correcting mechanism. The power of science is manifested in its exclusion of the personal factors of knowledge producers. Through de-subjectivity, knowledge becomes value free in the process of refinement, so that everyone has to accept it. Repeated experiments, peer criticism and sentences in the passive voice are all manifestations of de-valuing and de-subjectivity. Thagard (1989) says that scientific cognition is a kind of ‘cold cognition’ of the scientific community without the influence of emotions, feelings and other factors. However, the results of numerous case studies in the contemporary sociology of scientific knowledge have revealed the presence of gender, class and national interests in the formation of scientific knowledge and even in scientific knowledge itself. Science is not something that is formed in the body and then detached from it. AI, a machine intelligence created by human beings, is a product of science that seems to have nothing to do with the human body, but cannot be separated from it. On the one hand, the hardware and software of AI are created by humans, who have bodies; on the other hand, AI is first and foremost enabled by injecting the intelligence contained in human bodies into machines, before the self-evolution of AI is made possible. Moreover, AI can be imagined only with the simulation of embodied intelligence. Based on this, Zhenhua Zhou, Jianhua Xie and Jing Wang have proposed two possibilities for the future development of machine intelligence by comparing embodied intelligence with current machine intelligence.

The prospect and metaphysical analysis of conscious artificial intelligence

Artificial Intelligence and Its Self-Consciousness

Decoding Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence

The problem with AI consciousness: A neurogenetic case against synthetic sentience

Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain

Could artificial intelligence have consciousness? Some perspectives from neurology and parapsychology

From Biological Consciousness to Machine Consciousness: an Approach to Make Smarter Machines

Artificial consciousness: Utopia or real possibility?

AI and the Neurobiology of Consciousness

The Ethics of Machine Consciousness: Components, Detection, and Implications

Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness

Challenging the Boundary between Self-Awareness and Self-Consciousness in AI from the Perspectives of Philosophy

Is Artificial Consciousness Possible

AI Consciousness is Inevitable: A Theoretical Computer Science Perspective

Reflections on and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence: from Metaphysical and Physical Perspectives

Artificial consciousness. Some logical and conceptual preliminaries

Can Machines Have Consciousness?

Discerning Artificial Consciousness from Artificial Intelligence - A Thought Experiment

Human Consciousness and Artificial Intelligent

Towards the Artificial Brain: A Base Framework for Modelling Consciousness and Unconsciousness

Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness