What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the application of generative large - scale language models (Generative Large Language Models, LLMs) in automated fact - checking. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Widespread dissemination of false information**: With the rise of social media, the spread of false information has become a serious social challenge. Although manual fact - checking is still necessary, generative LLMs offer new possibilities for supporting fact - checkers through their vast knowledge bases and advanced reasoning capabilities. 2. **Improving the efficiency and accuracy of fact - checking**: Traditional fact - checking mainly relies on manpower, but human resources are limited and it is difficult to cope with the ever - increasing amount of false information. Therefore, the paper explores how to use generative LLMs to improve the efficiency and accuracy of fact - checking. 3. **Review and limitations of existing methods**: The paper provides a comprehensive review of the existing application methods of generative LLMs in fact - checking and points out the limitations of these methods. By providing a comprehensive overview, the paper hopes to enhance researchers' understanding of the application of generative LLMs in fact - checking and promote further development in this field. ### Main contributions - **Comprehensive overview**: The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the methods and limitations of using generative LLMs for automated fact - checking, covering 69 related papers. - **Method classification**: The paper classifies the methods into three categories according to the output types of generative LLMs: structured output, unstructured output, and synthetic data generation. - **Technical analysis**: The paper analyzes various techniques in detail, such as Prompting, Fine - tuning, and Augmentation with External Knowledge, and explores the application of these techniques in fact - checking tasks. ### Specific tasks The paper discusses the application of generative LLMs in the following fact - checking tasks: 1. **Fact verification and fake news detection**: This is the most common task, which involves evaluating the authenticity of a given claim or checking the credibility of a longer text (such as a news article). 2. **Evidence retrieval**: Collect key information from reliable sources to evaluate the authenticity of a claim. 3. **Claim detection**: Identify claims that contain verifiable information and may require further verification. 4. **Detection of verified claims**: Reduce the repetitive work of fact - checkers and improve efficiency by identifying similar claims that have already been verified in the database. ### Method classification - **Structured output**: Generate answers with a predefined structure, such as category labels in classification tasks, numerical scores in regression tasks, etc. - **Unstructured output**: Generate continuous text, such as explanations, summaries, etc. - **Synthetic data generation**: Generate new datasets or parts of datasets for training or fine - tuning other models. ### Technical analysis - **Prompting**: Improve the performance of LLMs by designing instructions, especially in cases where data is limited. - **Fine - tuning**: Adapt the pre - trained model to a specific task, especially when the model cannot effectively complete the task through prompting. - **External knowledge augmentation**: Combine external tools and knowledge bases to provide up - to - date information and improve the accuracy of fact - checking. Through these methods and techniques, the paper hopes to provide researchers with a comprehensive perspective and promote the broader application and development of generative LLMs in fact - checking.

Generative Large Language Models in Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey

Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity

The Perils & Promises of Fact-checking with Large Language Models

Factuality of Large Language Models: A Survey

The perils and promises of fact-checking with large language models

Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking

Are Large Language Models Good Fact Checkers: A Preliminary Study

Automated Claim Matching with Large Language Models: Empowering Fact-Checkers in the Fight Against Misinformation

Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking

Are Large Language Models Reliable Judges? A Study on the Factuality Evaluation Capabilities of LLMs

Evaluating Large Language Model Capability in Vietnamese Fact-Checking Data Generation

Long-form factuality in large language models

Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantification

Fact or Fiction? Can LLMs be Reliable Annotators for Political Truths?

Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models

Large Language Model Agent for Fake News Detection

Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Models

Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness -- Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong

Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks

Artificial intelligence—friend or foe in fake news campaigns

Evaluating the Factuality of Large Language Models using Large-Scale Knowledge Graphs