Long-form factuality in large language models

Jerry Wei,Chengrun Yang,Xinying Song,Yifeng Lu,Nathan Hu,Jie Huang,Dustin Tran,Daiyi Peng,Ruibo Liu,Da Huang,Cosmo Du,Quoc V. Le
2024-04-04
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) often generate content that contains factual errors when responding to fact-seeking prompts on open-ended topics. To benchmark a model's long-form factuality in open domains, we first use GPT-4 to generate LongFact, a prompt set comprising thousands of questions spanning 38 topics. We then propose that LLM agents can be used as automated evaluators for long-form factuality through a method which we call Search-Augmented Factuality Evaluator (SAFE). SAFE utilizes an LLM to break down a long-form response into a set of individual facts and to evaluate the accuracy of each fact using a multi-step reasoning process comprising sending search queries to Google Search and determining whether a fact is supported by the search results. Furthermore, we propose extending F1 score as an aggregated metric for long-form factuality. To do so, we balance the percentage of supported facts in a response (precision) with the percentage of provided facts relative to a hyperparameter representing a user's preferred response length (recall). Empirically, we demonstrate that LLM agents can outperform crowdsourced human annotators - on a set of ~16k individual facts, SAFE agrees with crowdsourced human annotators 72% of the time, and on a random subset of 100 disagreement cases, SAFE wins 76% of the time. At the same time, SAFE is more than 20 times cheaper than human annotators. We also benchmark thirteen language models on LongFact across four model families (Gemini, GPT, Claude, and PaLM-2), finding that larger language models generally achieve better long-form factuality. LongFact, SAFE, and all experimental code are available at this https URL.
Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper proposes a solution to the problem of errors in generating long factual content by large language models. They create a large evaluation set called LongFact, which consists of thousands of questions on multiple topics, to test the accuracy of models in generating long factual content in open domains. They also propose an automated evaluation method called Search-Augmented Factuality Evaluator (SAFE), which decomposes the long answers generated by language models and verifies the accuracy of each fact using Google search. SAFE outperforms human annotators in evaluating long factual content and is more cost-effective. Additionally, they introduce the F1 @K metric to quantify the factuality of long content by considering both precision and recall. The research finds that larger language models generally perform better in terms of accuracy of long factual content.