Abstract:Price and Wharton have recently suggested that "constrained retrocausal collider bias is the origin of entanglement." In this paper, we argue that their connection across a constrained collider (CCC) for the V-shaped case with the Bell states is not "a mechanism for entanglement," providing a negative answer to the title of <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2406.04571" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04571">arXiv:2406.04571</a>. Rather, CCC should be viewed as a novel approach to the causal modeling of entanglement, providing a perspectival co-causal relationship between the two wings of the experiment that does not violate locality or statistical independence. The key is to accept that quantum mechanics is complete, so the Bell states provide the "mechanism for entanglement" and CCC provides a causal model of entanglement per causal perspectivalism in accord with the different subjective spacetime models of the experiment. When combined into an objective spacetime model of the experiment, the subjective co-causation disappears leaving an objective acausal view of entanglement in accord with the quantum reconstruction program. Essentially, the quantum reconstruction program has rendered quantum mechanics a principle theory based on the observer-independence of Planck's constant h as justified by the relativity principle ("no preferred reference frame" NPRF), exactly as special relativity is a principle theory based on the observer-independence of the speed of light c as justified by the relativity principle. Thus, NPRF + c is an adynamical global constraint on the configuration of worldtubes for the equipment in the experiment while NPRF + h is an adynamical global constraint on the distribution of quantum detection events in that context. Accordingly, CCC then provides a new way to understand causation subjectively per causal perspectivalism in this objectively acausal spacetime model of the experiment.

Price-Wharton Constrained Colliders: Co-Causation or No Causation?

Why entanglement?

A Mechanism for Entanglement?

W as the Edge of a Wedge: Bell Correlations via Constrained Colliders

Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?

On modifications of Reichenbach's principle of common cause in light of Bell's theorem

Causation does not explain contextuality

Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem

The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning

A causal modelling analysis of Bell scenarios in space-time: implications of jamming non-local correlations for relativistic causality principles

Quantum Entanglement without nonlocal causation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetime

Cyclic Quantum Causal Models

Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time

Consistent Quantum Causes

Quantum stochastic phase-space theorems lead to hidden causal loops in a model for measurement consistent with macroscopic realism, Bell nonlocality and no-signaling

An intrinsic causality principle in histories-based quantum theory: a proposal

Causality in relativistic quantum interactions without mediators

New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory

A New Class of Retrocausal Models

Reconsidering Relativistic Causality