Abstract:Price and Wharton have recently suggested that "constrained retrocausal collider bias is the origin of entanglement." In this paper, we argue that their connection across a constrained collider (CCC) for the V-shaped case with the Bell states is not "a mechanism for entanglement," providing a negative answer to the title of <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2406.04571" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04571">arXiv:2406.04571</a>. Rather, CCC should be viewed as a novel approach to the causal modeling of entanglement, providing a perspectival co-causal relationship between the two wings of the experiment that does not violate locality or statistical independence. The key is to accept that quantum mechanics is complete, so the Bell states provide the "mechanism for entanglement" and CCC provides a causal model of entanglement per causal perspectivalism in accord with the different subjective spacetime models of the experiment. When combined into an objective spacetime model of the experiment, the subjective co-causation disappears leaving an objective acausal view of entanglement in accord with the quantum reconstruction program. Essentially, the quantum reconstruction program has rendered quantum mechanics a principle theory based on the observer-independence of Planck's constant h as justified by the relativity principle ("no preferred reference frame" NPRF), exactly as special relativity is a principle theory based on the observer-independence of the speed of light c as justified by the relativity principle. Thus, NPRF + c is an adynamical global constraint on the configuration of worldtubes for the equipment in the experiment while NPRF + h is an adynamical global constraint on the distribution of quantum detection events in that context. Accordingly, CCC then provides a new way to understand causation subjectively per causal perspectivalism in this objectively acausal spacetime model of the experiment.

A Mechanism for Entanglement?

Why entanglement?

W as the Edge of a Wedge: Bell Correlations via Constrained Colliders

Price-Wharton Constrained Colliders: Co-Causation or No Causation?

Entanglement is Sometimes Enough

Bell Correlations as Selection Artefacts

Entanglement and Nonlocality in Multi-Particle Systems

Quantum Entanglement without nonlocal causation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetime

Quantum Entanglement Partly Demystified

Entangled Baryons: Violation of Inequalities Based on Local Realism Assuming Dependence of Decays on Hidden Variables

All-Versus-Nothing Violation of Local Realism by Swapping Entanglement

Bell's Experiment in Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physics

Entanglement quantification via nonlocality

Scheme for Demonstrating the Bell Theorem in Tripartite Entanglement Between Atomic Ensembles

Amplification of gravitationally induced entanglement

Understanding the interplay of entanglement and nonlocality: motivating and developing a new branch of entanglement theory

Experimental entanglement-assisted quantum delayed-choice experiment

Entanglement and nonlocality in a coupled-cavity system

Entanglement Structures in Quantum Field Theories II: Distortions of Vacuum Correlations Through the Lens of Local Observers

Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders