Divergences in classical and quantum linear response and equation of motion formulations

Erik Rosendahl Kjellgren,Peter Reinholdt,Karl Michael Ziems,Stephan P. A. Sauer,Sonia Coriani,Jacob Kongsted
2024-06-25
Abstract:Calculating molecular properties using quantum devices can be done through the quantum linear response (qLR) or, equivalently, the quantum equation of motion (qEOM) formulations. Different parameterizations of qLR and qEOM are available, namely naive, projected, self-consistent, and state-transfer. In the naive and projected parameterizations, the metric is not the identity, and we show that it depends on the redundant orbital rotations. This dependency may lead to divergences in the excitation energies for certain choices of the redundant orbital rotation parameters in an idealized noise-less setting. Further, this leads to significant variance when calculations include statistical noise from finite quantum sampling.
Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the differences between classical and quantum linear response (LR) and equation of motion (EOM) methods in computing molecular properties, with a particular focus on different parameterization methods for performing quantum linear response (qLR) or quantum equation of motion (qEOM) calculations on quantum devices. The authors point out that in certain parameterization schemes, such as the original and projection schemes, the choice of redundant orbital rotation parameters can lead to divergence in the excitation energy. Additionally, they discuss how statistical noise from finite quantum sampling significantly affects the variability of the results. The paper begins by emphasizing the importance of predicting molecular system properties in quantum chemistry, such as absorption spectra, which are typically based on EOM or LR methods. It then extensively discusses different types of qLR and qEOM methods, including self-consistent, projection, and state transfer parameterizations, and highlights that the S[2] matrix (i.e., the metric matrix) in these methods must be non-singular to ensure the existence of solutions. Using the helium atom model system, the authors demonstrate how the computation of excitation energy is influenced by the choice of redundant orbital rotation parameters under the original and projection parameterizations. They find that divergence occurs when these parameters cause the S[2] matrix to become singular. Additionally, they investigate the impact of statistical noise on the results, pointing out that specific orbital selections may increase the instability of the computations in quantum computer simulations. In summary, this paper reveals the divergence issues and computational uncertainties introduced by selecting different parameterization schemes and orbital rotations when using qLR and qEOM methods in quantum computations, which is crucial for designing more stable and reliable quantum algorithms.