Abstract:Theories related to cognitive sciences, Human-in-the-loop Cyber-physical systems, data analysis for decision-making, and computational ethics make clear the need to create transdisciplinary learning, research, and application strategies to bring coherence to the paradigm of a truly human-oriented technology. Autonomous objects assume more responsibilities for individual and collective phenomena, they have gradually filtered into routines and require the incorporation of ethical practice into the professions related to the development, modeling, and design of algorithms. To make this possible, it is pertinent and urgent to bring them closer to the problems and approaches of the humanities. Increasingly transdisciplinary research must be part of the construction of systems that provide developers and scientists with the necessary bases to understand the ethical debate and therefore their commitment to society. This article considers two theories as articulating axes: Blumenberg’s, coming from the field of philosophy, for whom the process of technification and especially the implementation of mathematical models in their algorithmic form leads to an emptying of meaning and therefore makes programmers who implement their functions to be alien to the concerns that gave them origin; Daston’s, belonging to the field of the history of science and according to which the division of labor in the processes of technification of the calculation implies a kind of subordination in which those who implement the inventions of a small group of privileged mathematicians ignore the procedures that put them into operation. Given these two theories, the black box models prevalent in AI development, and the urgency of establishing explanatory frameworks for the development of computational ethics, this article exposes the need to give a voice to the cultural history of consciousness for promoting the discussions around the implementation of mathematical algorithms. The paper takes as a reference the different points of view that have emerged around the study of technological ethics, its applicability, management, and design. It criticizes the current state of studies from a humanistic perspective and explains how the historical perspective allows promoting the training of software engineers, developers and creators so that they assume intuitions and moral values in the development of their work. Specifically, it aims to expose how cultural history, applied to the study of consciousness and its phenomena, makes those involved in this technological revolution aware of the effect that they, through their algorithms, have on society in general and on human beings in particular.

From decision aiding to the massive use of algorithms: where does the responsibility stand?

Social Responsibility of Algorithms

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

"Computer Says No": Algorithmic Decision Support and Organisational Responsibility

The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate

Owning Decisions: AI Decision-Support and the Attributability-Gap

Can everyday AI be ethical. Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms

Unravelling Responsibility for AI

A toolkit of dilemmas: Beyond debiasing and fairness formulas for responsible AI/ML

Responsible (use of) AI

Diffused responsibility: attributions of responsibility in the use of AI-driven clinical decision support systems

The ethics of algorithms from the perspective of the cultural history of consciousness: first look

The Principles and Limits of Algorithm-in-the-Loop Decision Making

The future of AI in our hands? To what extent are we as individuals morally responsible for guiding the development of AI in a desirable direction?

Towards algorithm auditing: managing legal, ethical and technological risks of AI, ML and associated algorithms

In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence

Delegating Responsibilities to Intelligent Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Benefits

Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics’

Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence

On the (non-) reliance on algorithms—A decision-theoretic account

Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account