Abstract:Classic results establish that encouraging predictive diversity improves performance in ensembles of low-capacity models, e.g. through bagging or boosting. Here we demonstrate that these intuitions do not apply to high-capacity neural network ensembles (deep ensembles), and in fact the opposite is often true. In a large scale study of nearly 600 neural network classification ensembles, we examine a variety of interventions that trade off component model performance for predictive diversity. While such interventions can improve the performance of small neural network ensembles (in line with standard intuitions), they harm the performance of the large neural network ensembles most often used in practice. Surprisingly, we also find that discouraging predictive diversity is often benign in large-network ensembles, fully inverting standard intuitions. Even when diversity-promoting interventions do not sacrifice component model performance (e.g. using heterogeneous architectures and training paradigms), we observe an opportunity cost associated with pursuing increased predictive diversity. Examining over 1000 ensembles, we observe that the performance benefits of diverse architectures/training procedures are easily dwarfed by the benefits of simply using higher-capacity models, despite the fact that such higher capacity models often yield significantly less predictive diversity. Overall, our findings demonstrate that standard intuitions around predictive diversity, originally developed for low-capacity ensembles, do not directly apply to modern high-capacity deep ensembles. This work clarifies fundamental challenges to the goal of improving deep ensembles by making them more diverse, while suggesting an alternative path: simply forming ensembles from ever more powerful (and less diverse) component models.

On Uniform, Bayesian, and PAC-Bayesian Deep Ensembles

Optimizing Weights by Genetic Algorithm for Neural Network Ensemble

Dynamically Weighted Ensemble Neural Networks for Regression Problems

Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspective

Sequential Bayesian Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

The Case for Bayesian Deep Learning

Ensembling over Classifiers: a Bias-Variance Perspective

Improving Deep Neural Network Ensembles Using Reconstruction Error

Pathologies of Predictive Diversity in Deep Ensembles

Deep Ensembles Work, But Are They Necessary?

On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles

Dynamic Post-Hoc Neural Ensemblers

Are Ensembles Getting Better all the Time?

Improving Generalization of Complex Models under Unbounded Loss Using PAC-Bayes Bounds

Ensembling Neural Networks: Many Could Be Better Than All

The Disparate Benefits of Deep Ensembles

BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learning

Neural Network Ensembles: Theory, Training, and the Importance of Explicit Diversity

Adaptive Ensemble Prediction for Deep Neural Networks based on Confidence Level

Higher-Order Generalization Bounds: Learning Deep Probabilistic Programs via PAC-Bayes Objectives

PEnBayes: A Multi-Layered Ensemble Approach for Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Big Data