Abstract:Classic results establish that encouraging predictive diversity improves performance in ensembles of low-capacity models, e.g. through bagging or boosting. Here we demonstrate that these intuitions do not apply to high-capacity neural network ensembles (deep ensembles), and in fact the opposite is often true. In a large scale study of nearly 600 neural network classification ensembles, we examine a variety of interventions that trade off component model performance for predictive diversity. While such interventions can improve the performance of small neural network ensembles (in line with standard intuitions), they harm the performance of the large neural network ensembles most often used in practice. Surprisingly, we also find that discouraging predictive diversity is often benign in large-network ensembles, fully inverting standard intuitions. Even when diversity-promoting interventions do not sacrifice component model performance (e.g. using heterogeneous architectures and training paradigms), we observe an opportunity cost associated with pursuing increased predictive diversity. Examining over 1000 ensembles, we observe that the performance benefits of diverse architectures/training procedures are easily dwarfed by the benefits of simply using higher-capacity models, despite the fact that such higher capacity models often yield significantly less predictive diversity. Overall, our findings demonstrate that standard intuitions around predictive diversity, originally developed for low-capacity ensembles, do not directly apply to modern high-capacity deep ensembles. This work clarifies fundamental challenges to the goal of improving deep ensembles by making them more diverse, while suggesting an alternative path: simply forming ensembles from ever more powerful (and less diverse) component models.

Deep Ensembles Work, But Are They Necessary?

Pathologies of Predictive Diversity in Deep Ensembles

Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspective

On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles

Deep Neural Network Ensembles against Deception: Ensemble Diversity, Accuracy and Robustness

Improving Deep Neural Network Ensembles Using Reconstruction Error

Neural Network Ensembles: Theory, Training, and the Importance of Explicit Diversity

Adaptive Ensemble Prediction for Deep Neural Networks based on Confidence Level

You can have your ensemble and run it too -- Deep Ensembles Spread Over Time

Ensembling Neural Networks: Many Could Be Better Than All

(Implicit) Ensembles of Ensembles: Epistemic Uncertainty Collapse in Large Models

Sequential Bayesian Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusion

Are Ensembles Getting Better all the Time?

The Disparate Benefits of Deep Ensembles

Revisiting Ensembles in an Adversarial Context: Improving Natural Accuracy

Deep interpretable ensembles

Deep Anti-Regularized Ensembles provide reliable out-of-distribution uncertainty quantification

Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Task

Why have a Unified Predictive Uncertainty? Disentangling it using Deep Split Ensembles

What influences the accuracy of decision tree ensembles?