Michele Zhu,Lorenzo Cazzella,Francesco Linsalata,Maurizio Magarini,Matteo Matteucci,Umberto Spagnolini
Abstract:Digital Twin has emerged as a promising paradigm for accurately representing wireless communication electromagnetic environments. The resulting virtual representation of reality facilitates comprehensive insights into the propagation environment, empowering multi-layer decision-making processes at the physical communication level. This paper investigates the impact of ray-based model simulation within real-time Digital Twins. A benchmark for ray-based propagation simulations is presented to evaluate computational time, considering two urban scenarios characterized by different mesh complexity, single and multiple wireless link configurations, and simulations with/without diffuse scattering. Exhaustive empirical analyses are performed showing the behavior of different ray-based solutions. By offering standardized simulations and scenarios, this work provides a technical benchmark for practitioners involved in the implementation of real-time Digital Twins and optimization of ray-based propagation models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the computational performance challenges of real - time Digital Twins (DT) in the electromagnetic environment (EM environment), especially in the context of the sixth - generation (6G) wireless communication network. Specifically, the author focuses on the high computational cost problem faced by ray - based propagation simulations when performing real - time updates and optimizations in complex urban environments. To address this challenge, the paper proposes a benchmarking framework for evaluating the computational time performance of different ray - launching software in handling electromagnetic environment propagation simulations.
### Main problem description of the paper
1. **High computational cost**: Although the ray - based propagation simulation method can provide accurate propagation path estimates, its computational complexity is high, especially when considering environmental interactions such as multiple reflections, diffractions, and diffuse scattering. This makes real - time updating of digital twins a major challenge.
2. **Timeliness in a dynamic environment**: In a rapidly changing urban environment, such as in vehicle - moving scenarios, traditional propagation models may not be able to reflect the changes in the actual environment in a timely manner, resulting in simulation results lagging behind the actual situation.
3. **Lack of a standardized evaluation framework**: Currently, there is a lack of a unified benchmarking framework for evaluating the computational performance of different ray - launching software, making it difficult to compare and select the optimal solution.
### Solutions
To solve the above problems, the paper proposes a standardized computational performance benchmarking framework. Specific contributions include:
- **Defining an empirical benchmark test** for evaluating and comparing the computational performance of different ray - launching simulation software in two urban scenarios with different geometric representation complexities.
- **Evaluating the time performance of multiple ray - launching software**, including single - link configurations and multi - link configurations, and considering the impact of GPU acceleration.
- **Providing reproducible benchmarking resources**, including 3D scene grids and source code, to ensure that other researchers can reproduce the experimental results.
Through these efforts, the paper aims to provide a technical benchmark for researchers and developers engaged in the implementation of real - time digital twins, helping them better understand and optimize ray - based propagation simulation methods.
### Formula representation
The formulas involved in the paper mainly focus on computational time and complexity analysis. For example, the following formulas are used when calculating the sample mean and variance:
\[
\mu=\frac{1}{K} \sum_{k = 1}^{K} t_k
\]
\[
\sigma^{2}=\frac{1}{K - 1} \sum_{k = 1}^{K}(t_k-\mu)^{2}
\]
Here, \(t_k\) represents the computational time of the \(k\) - th transmit - receive configuration, and \(K\) is the total number of transmit - receive configurations. These formulas are used to evaluate the computational performance under different configurations and show the fluctuation of the results through error bar graphs.
Hopefully, this information can help you understand the core problems of this paper and their solutions. If you have more questions or need further explanations, please feel free to let us know!