Abstract:As Android platform evolves in a fast pace, API-related compatibility issues become a significant challenge for developers. To handle an incompatible API invocation, developers mainly have two choices: merely performing sufficient checks to avoid invoking incompatible APIs on platforms that do not support them, or gracefully providing replacement implementations on those incompatible platforms. As providing more consistent app behaviors, the latter one is more recommended and more challenging to adopt. However, it is still unknown how these issues are handled in the real world, do developers meet difficulties and what can we do to help them. In light of this, this paper performs the first large-scale study on the current practice of handling evolution-induced API compatibility issues in about 300,000 Android market apps, and more importantly, their solutions (if exist). Actually, it is in general very challenging to determine if developers have put in counter-measure for a compatibility issue, as different APIs have diverse behaviors, rendering various repair. To facilitate a large-scale study, this paper proposes RAPID, an automated tool to determine whether a compatibility issue has been addressed or not, by incorporating both static analysis and machine learning techniques. Results show that our trained classifier is quite effective by achieving a F1-score of 95.21% and 91.96% in the training stage and the validation stage respectively. With the help of RAPID, our study yields many interesting findings, e.g. developers are not willing to provide alternative implementations when handling incompatible API invocations (only 38.4%); for those incompatible APIs that Google gives replacement recommendations, the ratio of providing alternative implementations is significantly higher than those without recommendations; developers find more ways to repair compatibility issues than Google's recommendations and the knowledge acquired from these experienced developers would be extremely useful to novice developers and may significantly improve the current status of compatibility issue handling.

Recover as It is Designed to Be: Recovering from Compatibility Mobile App Crashes by Reusing User Flows

Automatically Detecting API-induced Compatibility Issues in Android Apps: A Comparative Analysis (Replicability Study)

Repairing Crashes in Android Apps

Healing Data Loss Problems in Android Apps

Demystifying Device-specific Compatibility Issues in Android Apps

An Observational Study on Compatibility-Related API Usage

How Android Developers Handle Evolution-Induced API Compatibility Issues: a Large-Scale Study.

Flexible Installability of Android Apps with App-level Virtualization based Decomposition

Understanding and Detecting Fragmentation-Induced Compatibility Issues for Android Apps

A Fast Crash Reproduction Method for Android Applications Based On Widget Hierarchy Graphs

Who Should We Blame for Android App Crashes? An In-Depth Study at Scale and Practical Resolutions

A Novel Re-Targetable Application Development Platform for Healthcare Mobile Applications

Software Micro-Rejuvenation for Android Mobile Systems

Taming Android Fragmentation through Lightweight Crowdsourced Testing

Automatically Distilling Storyboard with Rich Features for Android Apps

Extracting Mapping Relations for Mobile User Interface Transformation

Replaying Harmful Data Races in Android Apps

ELEGANT: Towards Effective Location of Fragmentation-Induced Compatibility Issues for Android Apps

Reproducing Timing-dependent GUI Flaky Tests in Android Apps Via A Single Event Delay

Reflow: Automatically Improving Touch Interactions in Mobile Applications through Pixel-based Refinements

App in the Middle