Abstract:The popularity of Android platform on mobile devices has attracted much attention from many developers and researchers, as well as malware writers. Recently, Jamrozik et al. proposed a technique to secure Android applications referred to as mining sandboxes. They used an automated test case generation technique to explore the behavior of the app under test and then extracted a set of sensitive APIs that were called. Based on the extracted sensitive APIs, they built a sandbox that can block access to APIs not used during testing. However, they only evaluated the proposed technique with benign apps but not investigated whether it was effective in detecting malicious behavior of malware that infects benign apps. Furthermore, they only investigated one test case generation tool (i.e., Droidmate) to build the sandbox, while many others have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we complement Jamrozik et al.'s work in two ways: (1) we evaluate the effectiveness of mining sandboxes on detecting malicious behaviors; (2) we investigate the effectiveness of multiple automated test case generation tools to mine sandboxes. To investigate effectiveness of mining sandboxes in detecting malicious behaviors, we make use of pairs of malware and benign app it infects. We build a sandbox based on sensitive APIs called by the benign app and check if it can identify malicious behaviors in the corresponding malware. To generate inputs to apps, we investigate five popular test case generation tools: Monkey, Droidmate, Droidbot, GUIRipper, and PUMA. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of these test case generation tools on detecting malicious behavior. In the first experiment, we select 10 apps and allow test case generation tools to run for one hour; while in the second experiment, we select 102 pairs of apps and allow the test case generation tools to run for one minute. Our experiments highlight that 75.5%-77.2% of malware in our dataset can be uncovered by mining sandboxes - showing its power to protect Android apps. We also find that Droidbot performs best in generating test cases for mining sandboxes, and its effectiveness can be further boosted when coupled with other test case generation tools.

Replaying Harmful Data Races in Android Apps

PredRacer: Predictively Detecting Data Races in Android Applications

Demystifying Diehard Android Apps.

NDroid: Toward Tracking Information Flows Across Multiple Android Contexts.

Mining Sandboxes: Are We There Yet?

Reviving Android Malware with DroidRide: and How Not To.

Effectively Manifesting Concurrency Bugs in Android Apps

Record and Replay for Android: Are We There Yet in Industrial Cases?

Reproducing Timing-dependent GUI Flaky Tests in Android Apps Via A Single Event Delay

Detecting Code Reuse In Android Applications Using Component-Based Control Flow Graph

DRDDR: a Lightweight Method to Detect Data Races in Linux Kernel

Analyzing Android Application in Real-Time at Kernel Level

Concurrency-related Flaky Test Detection in Android apps

Detecting Data Races in Interrupt-Driven Programs based on Static Analysis and Dynamic Simulation

Data race avoidance and replay scheme for developing and debugging parallel programs on distributed shared memory systems

Flaky Test Detection in Android Via Event Order Exploration

Exception Beyond Exception: Crashing Android System by Trapping in "Uncaughtexception"

Time-travel Testing of Android Apps

RepDroid: An Automated Tool for Android Application Repackaging Detection

Detecting Non-Crashing Functional Bugs in Android Apps Via Deep-State Differential Analysis.

A Benchmark of Data Loss Bugs for Android Apps