Abstract:Project managers need to manage risks throughout the project lifecycle and, thus, need to know how changes in activity durations influence project duration and risk. We propose a new indicator (the Activity Risk Index, ARI) that measures the contribution of each activity to the total project risk while it is underway. In particular, the indicator informs us about what activities contribute the most to the project's uncertainty so that project managers can pay closer attention to the performance of these activities. The main difference between our indicator and other activity sensitivity metrics in the literature (e.g. cruciality, criticality, significance, or schedule sensitivity indices) is that our indicator is based on the Schedule Risk Baseline concept instead of on cost or schedule baselines. The new metric not only provides information at the beginning of the project, but also while it is underway. Furthermore, the ARI is the only one to offer a normalized result: if we add its value for each activity, the total sum is 100%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper proposes a solution to the problem of risk assessment in project management. Traditional risk management methods mainly focus on the risks at the start of the project, while this paper introduces a new metric—the Activity Risk Index (ARI), which can dynamically measure the contribution of each activity to the overall project risk during the project's progress. The uniqueness of ARI lies in the fact that it is based on the schedule risk baseline, rather than cost or schedule baselines, and the results are normalized, with the ARI values of all activities adding up to 100%.
Through ARI, project managers can understand which activities have the greatest impact on project uncertainty, thus paying more attention to the execution of these activities. Compared to existing sensitivity indicators (such as criticality, significance, or schedule sensitivity index), ARI can also provide information during project execution and offers a standardized result.
The paper also reviews other activity sensitivity measurement standards, such as criticality index, cruciality index, significance index, schedule sensitivity analysis, etc., and compares their advantages and disadvantages. The authors propose a new sensitivity measurement standard—the Activity Risk Index (ARI), which considers the risk (variability) of activities and estimates risk based on the activity's position in the network and the network's characteristics.
The calculation of ARI takes into account the risk of activities, and as the project progresses, ARI can be continuously updated to reflect changes in project risk. This method helps project managers respond more accurately during the project monitoring phase and may have a positive impact on overall project performance.