Abstract:Algorithms play an increasingly-significant role in our social lives. Unfortunately, they often perpetuate social injustices while doing so. The popular means of addressing these algorithmic injustices has been through algorithmic reformism: fine-tuning the algorithm itself to be more fair, accountable, and transparent. While commendable, the emerging discipline of critical algorithm studies shows that reformist approaches have failed to curtail algorithmic injustice because they ignore the power structure surrounding algorithms. Heeding calls from critical algorithm studies to analyze this power structure, I employ a framework developed by Erik Olin Wright to examine the configuration of power surrounding Algorithmic Activity: the ways in which algorithms are researched, developed, trained, and deployed within society. I argue that the reason Algorithmic Activity is unequal, undemocratic, and unsustainable is that the power structure shaping it is one of economic empowerment rather than social empowerment. For Algorithmic Activity to be socially just, we need to transform this power configuration to empower the people at the other end of an algorithm. To this end, I explore Wright's symbiotic, interstitial, and raptural transformations in the context of Algorithmic Activity, as well as how they may be applied in a hypothetical research project that uses algorithms to address a social issue. I conclude with my vision for socially just Algorithmic Activity, asking that future work strives to integrate the proposed transformations and develop new mechanisms for social empowerment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problems that this paper attempts to solve are how algorithms continuously generate and perpetuate injustices in society and why the existing reform measures have failed to effectively curb these injustices. Specifically, the author explores the power structures surrounding algorithmic activity and points out that the current approach of algorithmic reformism ignores these power structures and thus cannot solve the problem fundamentally.
### Analysis of Main Problems
1. **Limitations of Algorithmic Reformism**:
- Existing algorithmic reformism mainly focuses on the adjustment of algorithms themselves, such as improving transparency, fairness, and accountability, but ignores the power structures and social dynamics behind algorithms.
- Although these reform measures have their value, their effectiveness is limited because they fail to address broader structural issues.
2. **Impact of Power Structures**:
- The author cites Erik Olin Wright's theoretical framework to analyze the power configuration surrounding algorithmic activity, especially the interaction among economic power, state power, and social power.
- The current power configuration is dominated by economic power, which leads to serious deficiencies in algorithmic activity in terms of equality, democracy, and sustainability, thus exacerbating social injustice.
3. **Requirements for Social Justice**:
- In order to achieve more just algorithmic activity, the author proposes that the power structure needs to be reconfigured so that social power becomes dominant and ensures that algorithmic activity can better serve social interests.
- To this end, the author explores the three transformation strategies proposed by Wright: symbiotic transformations, interstitial transformations, and raptural transformations, and discusses their applications in algorithmic activity.
### Overview of Solutions
- **Symbiotic Transformations**: Deepen social empowerment through existing institutions, for example, by formulating stricter regulatory policies and providing more accountability mechanisms.
- **Interstitial Transformations**: Establish new forms of social empowerment at the margins of the existing system, such as participatory design and the de - Westernization of social data.
- **Raptural Transformations**: Completely break the existing power structure and reconstruct new emancipatory institutions, such as redistributing technology and data resources.
Through these transformation strategies, the author hopes to promote algorithmic activity to shift from a model dominated by economic interests to a model that pays more attention to social justice and social empowerment.