Generative AI Enhances Team Performance and Reduces Need for Traditional Teams

Ning Li,Huaikang Zhou,Kris Mikel-Hong

2024-05-28

Abstract:Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed collaborative work processes, yet the impact on team performance remains underexplored. Here we examine the role of generative AI in enhancing or replacing traditional team dynamics using a randomized controlled experiment with 435 participants across 122 teams. We show that teams augmented with generative AI significantly outperformed those relying solely on human collaboration across various performance measures. Interestingly, teams with multiple AIs did not exhibit further gains, indicating diminishing returns with increased AI integration. Our analysis suggests that centralized AI usage by a few team members is more effective than distributed engagement. Additionally, individual-AI pairs matched the performance of conventional teams, suggesting a reduced need for traditional team structures in some contexts. However, despite this capability, individual-AI pairs still fell short of the performance levels achieved by AI-assisted teams. These findings underscore that while generative AI can replace some traditional team functions, more comprehensively integrating AI within team structures provides superior benefits, enhancing overall effectiveness beyond individual efforts.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence,General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses how generative artificial intelligence (AI) affects team performance and traditional team dynamics. A randomized controlled experiment was conducted to study the performance of 122 teams consisting of 435 participants under different conditions (no AI, single AI assistance, and multiple AI assistance). The study found that teams assisted by AI performed significantly better than teams relying solely on human collaboration in various performance metrics. However, adding more AI did not always lead to additional benefits and there was a phenomenon of diminishing marginal returns. Centralized AI usage was more effective than distributed usage, and the combination of individuals and AI could match the performance of traditional teams in certain situations but could not fully replace them.

The paper also points out that while AI can enhance individual capabilities, its comprehensive integration in teams can provide better results, surpassing the overall efficiency of individual efforts. However, different AI integration structures have subtle effects on team dynamics and outcomes. The research indicates that the introduction of AI did not significantly reduce task completion time but did improve team morale and member satisfaction. Additionally, teams with higher intelligence, stronger team familiarity, and larger team sizes benefited more from multiple AI units.

The experiment also compared the performance of teams assisted by AI with individuals paired with AI and found that the latter could reach the level of traditional teams with enough time, but at a faster speed. This suggests that AI can enhance individual productivity, but the advantages of team collaboration still remain important.

Overall, the paper reveals the complex role of AI in teams and emphasizes the importance of balancing AI integration and human team collaboration to optimize productivity and innovation.