Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Brainstorming: How Humans and Ai Beat Humans Alone

Sebastian G. Bouschery,Vera Blazevic,Frank T. Piller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4724068
2024-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has challenged the notion of creativity as an inherently human trait. This AI creativity might prove especially valuable in brainstorming exercises. Particularly, when paired with human creativity. Such hybrid teams may help to overcome the productivity losses typically present in human brainstorming groups. To test this idea, we conduct a lab experiment (N = 168), comparing nominal, interactive, hybrid (human-AI), and AI-only groups and their respective abilities to generate creative ideas. We draw on the Search for Ideas in Associative Memory (SIAM) theory to inform our exploration of generative AI and its potential to influence processes like cognitive stimulation, production blocking, and social inhibition. We re-evaluate creativity theories in the context of AI, contributing to the theoretical and practical understanding of creative processes in the era of AI. Additionally, we provide qualitative insights into participants’ experiences to complement our findings. We find that hybrid groups outperform interactive and nominal groups in terms of brainstorming productivity and creativity. Furthermore, our study suggests that AI alone is far more efficient at generating creative ideas. We discuss the implications of this research and call for additional research on hybrid intelligence in creative processes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?