Lorentz group in gravity theories

Jianbo Lu,Yongxin Guo,G. Y. Chee

2024-05-25

Abstract:In this paper, it is argued that in gravity theories the local Lorentz group can not be considered as a gauge group in the sense of Yang-Mills theories, the Lorentz connection is not a gauge potential but an artificial force, the inertial force. A genuine gravity theory should be a translation gauge theory, though a unnormal gauge theory. All the three theories of the Geometrical Trinity of Gravity are translation gauge theories. A real gravity theory should get rid of "gauging" Lorentz group. The covariantization of the teleparallel gravity is not necessary physically.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the role of the Lorentz group in gravitational theory and its relationship with gauge theory, proposing that gravitational theory should be viewed as a translation gauge theory.

Key points of the paper include:

1. **Role of the Lorentz Group**: The author argues that in gravitational theory, the local Lorentz group cannot be seen as analogous to the gauge group in Yang-Mills theory. The Lorentz connection is not a gauge potential but represents an artificial force of inertial force.

2. **Nature of Gravity**: The paper challenges the traditional view that "gravity is the curvature of spacetime." By discussing Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR) and Symmetric Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (STEGR), the author points out that describing gravity requires neither the curvature nor the torsion of spacetime, but only non-metricity.

3. **Gauge Theory Framework**: The author proposes that the true gravitational theory should be a translation gauge theory, albeit a non-standard gauge theory. All geometric trinity theories (i.e., the three ways of describing General Relativity) are translation gauge theories.

4. **Controversy of the Lorentz Group**: The discussion on local Lorentz invariance in modified teleparallel gravity theories is very heated. The author believes that the role of the Lorentz group in these theories is controversial and that its concept as a gauge group does not apply to gravitational theory.

5. **Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR) and Symmetric Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (STEGR)**: These theories indicate that describing gravity does not require the curvature of spacetime, overturning traditional notions.

6. **Classification of Gravitational Theories**: The author believes that the true gravitational theory should abandon the concept of the "gauge" Lorentz group and classify gravitational theories into two forms—metric form and teleparallel form, rather than geometric trinity.

7. **Theoretical Background**: The paper also reviews geometric tools and concepts such as affine geometry, tensors, torsion, and curvature, as well as their behavior under different coordinate transformations.

In summary, the core issue the paper attempts to address is: how to understand the role of the Lorentz group in gravitational theory and how gravitational theory should be correctly constructed as a gauge theory. The author argues that gravitational theory is essentially a translation gauge theory and challenges traditional views.