RoPINN: Region Optimized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Haixu Wu,Huakun Luo,Yuezhou Ma,Jianmin Wang,Mingsheng Long
2024-10-23
Abstract:Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely applied to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by enforcing outputs and gradients of deep models to satisfy target equations. Due to the limitation of numerical computation, PINNs are conventionally optimized on finite selected points. However, since PDEs are usually defined on continuous domains, solely optimizing models on scattered points may be insufficient to obtain an accurate solution for the whole domain. To mitigate this inherent deficiency of the default scatter-point optimization, this paper proposes and theoretically studies a new training paradigm as region optimization. Concretely, we propose to extend the optimization process of PINNs from isolated points to their continuous neighborhood regions, which can theoretically decrease the generalization error, especially for hidden high-order constraints of PDEs. A practical training algorithm, Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN), is seamlessly derived from this new paradigm, which is implemented by a straightforward but effective Monte Carlo sampling method. By calibrating the sampling process into trust regions, RoPINN finely balances optimization and generalization error. Experimentally, RoPINN consistently boosts the performance of diverse PINNs on a wide range of PDEs without extra backpropagation or gradient calculation. Code is available at this repository: <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/thuml/RoPINN" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.
Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the limitations of existing physics - informed neural networks (PINNs) when solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Specifically, traditional PINNs optimization methods are usually optimized only at discrete and finitely - selected points, which is inconsistent with the nature of PDEs defined on continuous domains. This optimization based on discrete points may lead to less accurate solutions of the model over the entire domain, especially when dealing with high - order constraints. ### Summary of Main Problems: 1. **Limitations of Discrete - Point Optimization**: - When solving PDEs, due to computational resources and numerical calculation limitations, traditional PINNs can only be optimized at a limited number of discrete points. - This discrete - point optimization method cannot fully capture the characteristics of PDEs on continuous domains, resulting in limited solution accuracy. 2. **Difficulties in Handling High - Order Constraints**: - To improve model performance, some methods attempt to enhance the optimization effect by adding high - order derivatives as regularization terms, but this will lead to numerical instability and increased computational cost. - Although variational methods can avoid high - order derivative calculations, they still face problems such as complex integral calculations and the need for a large number of sampling points. ### Solutions Proposed in the Paper: To solve the above problems, the paper proposes a new training paradigm - **Region Optimization**, and based on this, develops a specific algorithm - **Region Optimized PINN (RoPINN)**. The specific improvements are as follows: 1. **Expansion from Discrete Points to Neighborhood Regions**: - Expand the optimization process from isolated discrete points to their corresponding neighborhood regions, thereby more comprehensively considering the characteristics of PDEs on continuous domains. - Theoretically, this method can reduce generalization errors, especially when dealing with high - order constraints of PDEs. 2. **Monte Carlo Sampling Implementation**: - RoPINN implements region optimization through a simple Monte Carlo sampling method, which is both efficient and does not require additional gradient calculations. - Introduce a trust - region calibration strategy to control the estimation error by adaptively adjusting the sampling region size, ensuring the stability and reliability of the optimization. 3. **Experimental Verification**: - The experimental results show that RoPINN significantly improves the performance of different PINN models on various PDE tasks without requiring additional gradient calculations. - Compared with traditional high - order regularization and variational methods, RoPINN shows better consistency and robustness. ### Formula Representation: - **Point - Optimization Loss Function**: \[ L(u_\theta) = \lambda_\Omega \frac{1}{N_\Omega} \sum_{i = 1}^{N_\Omega} \| F(u_\theta)(x_i) \|^2 + \lambda_{\Omega_0} \frac{1}{N_{\Omega_0}} \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{\Omega_0}} \| I(u_\theta)(x_i) \|^2 + \lambda_{\partial\Omega} \frac{1}{N_{\partial\Omega}} \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{\partial\Omega}} \| B(u_\theta)(x_i) \|^2 \] - **Region - Optimization Loss Function**: \[ L_{\text{region}}^r (u_\theta, S) = \frac{1}{|S|} \sum_{x \in S} \int_{\Omega_r} L(u_\theta, x + \xi) d\xi \] where \(\Omega_r = [0, r]^{d + 1}\) represents the extended neighborhood region. Through these improvements, the paper successfully solves the limitations of traditional PINNs when solving PDEs and provides a more effective and reliable solution.