Abstract:The degree of static indeterminacy and its spatial distribution characterize load-bearing structures independent of a specific load case. The redundancy matrix stores the distribution of the static indeterminacy on its main diagonal, and thereby offers the possibility to use this property for the assessment of structures. It is especially suitable to be used in early planning stages for design exploration. In this paper, performance indicators with respect to robustness and assemblability are derived from the redundancy matrix. For each of the performance indicators, a detailed matrix-based derivation is given and the application is showcased with various truss examples.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to use the redundancy matrix as a performance indicator to evaluate the robustness and assemblability of a structure. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following two aspects:
1. **Robustness of the structure**:
- Existing building codes have clear regulations on the safety of structures, but the quantitative evaluation of redundancy and robustness is rather vague. The paper proposes using the redundancy matrix to quantify the robustness of a structure, ensuring that when some components fail, the overall performance of the structure will not be overly affected.
- Through the redundancy matrix, the change in elastic deformation of the structure under different component failure situations can be evaluated, thus enabling the design of more robust structures.
2. **Assemblability of the structure**:
- In the actual construction process, geometric imperfections may lead to an initial stress state, which in turn affects the load - bearing behavior of the structure. The paper explores how to optimize the assemblability of the structure by adjusting the design or assembly sequence to reduce the initial stress caused by manufacturing imperfections.
- A quantitative evaluation method based on the redundancy matrix is proposed to optimize the assembly process of the structure and ensure the minimization of the initial stress.
### Key formulas
- **Definition of the redundancy matrix**:
\[
R = I - AK^{-1}A^T C
\]
where:
- \( R \) is the redundancy matrix,
- \( I \) is the identity matrix,
- \( A \) is the compatibility matrix,
- \( K \) is the elastic stiffness matrix,
- \( C \) is the material matrix.
- **Change in elastic deformation**:
\[
\Delta e_r = a_r \Delta d = \frac{1 - R_{rr}}{R_{rr}} a_r d
\]
where:
- \( \Delta e_r \) is the elongation change after removing element \( r \),
- \( a_r \) is the row vector of the compatibility matrix related to the removed element,
- \( R_{rr} \) is the redundancy of the removed element.
### Main contributions of the paper
By introducing the redundancy matrix, the paper provides a new quantitative method to evaluate the robustness and assemblability of a structure. This method is especially suitable for the early design stage and can evaluate the pros and cons of different design schemes without clear load cases. Through a specific truss structure example, it shows how to achieve a uniform distribution of redundancy by optimizing the joint positions, thereby improving the robustness of the structure.
### Conclusion
The redundancy matrix proposed in the paper, as a performance indicator, can not only quantify the robustness and assemblability of a structure, but also provide a new tool for structural engineers, helping them make wiser decisions in the early design stage. This helps to improve the safety and reliability of the structure, while optimizing the assembly process and reducing the negative impacts brought by manufacturing imperfections.