Redundancy effects on seismic reliability of steel frame structures

Quanwang Li,Qinming Zhang,Jiansheng Fan,Can Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11332-229
2011-01-01
Abstract:The structural redundancy factor. was recommended in NEHRP and adopted in ASCE-7, for which structural systems are classified into redundant or non-redundant, and a uniform penalty factor of 1.3 on lateral design force is imposed on the latter. However, the uniform penalty on lateral design force fails to account for the large differences in configuration, ductility capacity and strength correlation, and possibly leads to poor designs. In this paper, the redundancies of steel frame structures were investigated. Major factors considered in this study included structural configuration (number of moment-resisting frames), over-strength ratio, ductility capacity of beam-column connections, uncertainties in load effects, and strength correlation. Three-dimensional nonlinear pushover analyses were performed to study the structural behaviors of steel frame structures, and the reliabilities of structural systems of equal total lateral strength but different configurations and ductility capacities were computed and compared. The results obtained shows that, to take advantage of structural redundancy, it is necessary (1) to increase the over-strength ratio to greater than 3 and decrease the strength correlation to less than 0.3; (2) to decrease the uncertainty associated with load effect; and (3) to guarantee a moderate ductility capacity of beam-column connection (no less than 4). It is also found that, the improvement in structural reliability against strength-related limit state is immaterial (1) to arrange more than 4 moment-resisting frames and (2) to enlarge the ductility capacity from moderate to high level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?