The Potential and Implications of Generative AI on HCI Education

Ahmed Kharrufa,Ian G Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3658619.3658627

2024-05-08

Abstract:Generative AI (GAI) is impacting teaching and learning directly or indirectly across a range of subjects and disciplines. As educators, we need to understand the potential and limitations of AI in HCI education and ensure our graduating HCI students are aware of the potential and limitations of AI in HCI. In this paper, we report on the main pedagogical insights gained from the inclusion of generative AI into a 10 week undergraduate module. We designed the module to encourage student experimentation with GAI models as part of the design brief requirement and planned practical sessions and discussions. Our insights are based on replies to a survey sent out to the students after completing the module. Our key findings, for HCI educators, report on the use of AI as a persona for developing project ideas and creating resources for design, and AI as a mirror for reflecting students' understanding of key concepts and ideas and highlighting knowledge gaps. We also discuss potential pitfalls that should be considered and the need to assess students' literacies and assumptions of GAIs as pedagogical tools. Finally, we put forward the case for educators to take the opportunities GAI presents as an educational tool and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their practice. We end with a discussion of our findings in relation to the TPACK framework in HCI.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the potential and impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education. The research focuses on how to integrate GAI into a 10-week undergraduate course to facilitate students' experimentation with GAI models and understand their applications in project ideation, resource creation, and reflection on key concept comprehension. Through surveys conducted after the course, the authors discovered the role of GAI in project ideation, design resource creation, and revealing knowledge gaps. At the same time, the paper also points out possible pitfalls, such as overreliance on AI for design evaluation and the need to assess students' AI literacy and assumptions.

The paper emphasizes that educators should seize the educational tool opportunities brought by GAI, encourage experimentation, innovation, and courage, and combine it with the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) framework to discuss the application of GAI in educational practices. The research methods include introducing GAI tools in the course, conducting practical sessions and discussions, and collecting student feedback after the course. The results show that GAI can enhance students' understanding of HCI principles but may also lead to misunderstandings and overreliance. Additionally, the research reveals contradictions in students' attitudes and behaviors towards GAI, such as recognizing AI bias while expecting it to overcome designer bias.

In summary, this paper aims to address how to effectively and critically utilize GAI in HCI education to enhance students' awareness of the potential and limitations of AI in their profession.