Student Reflections on Self-Initiated GenAI Use in HCI Education

Hauke Sandhaus,Maria Teresa Parreira,Wendy Ju

2024-05-03

Abstract:This study explores students' self-initiated use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in an interactive systems design class. Through 12 group interviews, students revealed the dual nature of GenAI in (1) stimulating creativity and (2) speeding up design iterations, alongside concerns over its potential to cause shallow learning and reliance. GenAI's benefits were pronounced in the execution phase of design, aiding rapid prototyping and ideation, while its use in initial insight generation posed risks to depth and reflective practice. This reflection highlights the complex role of GenAI in Human-Computer Interaction education, emphasizing the need for balanced integration to leverage its advantages without compromising fundamental learning outcomes.

Human-Computer Interaction

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the impact of students' voluntary use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education. The research, conducted through 12 groups of interviews, found that students experienced both the benefits of stimulating innovation and accelerating design iterations, as well as concerns about shallow learning and over-reliance caused by GenAI usage in different stages of the design process. GenAI was particularly useful in the execution phase for rapid prototyping and idea generation, but it may weaken deep learning and reflective practice in the initial insight phase.

The paper points out that GenAI contributes to creative idea generation in the "discover" stage of the design process, can be used for storyboarding and use case development in the "define" stage, accelerates visual asset creation and prototype assistance in the "develop" stage, and automates documentation writing and feedback synthesis in the "deliver" stage. However, GenAI may reduce the specificity of interview question generation and insight generation, leading to surface-level understanding. In terms of storyboarding generation and hardware integration, GenAI may restrict deep thinking and personalized expression.

The paper emphasizes the complex role of GenAI in HCI education, requiring a balanced integration of these tools to leverage their advantages without compromising core learning outcomes. The research suggests that as GenAI technology advances, educators need to reconsider curriculum design to adapt to this change and mitigate potential negative impacts.